Answer:All individuals, whether rich or poor, are dissatisfied with their material well-being and would like more.
Explanation: People who face poverty and who have no proper shelter , food or even proper clothes to wear are always yearning for a life that is better than that which they are experiencing. Their wishes and desires always exceed the available resources so there is always scarcity in this case.
At the same time those who are wealthy also do not have all the resources that they all wish they could have , no matter how much money one possesses in those wealthy nations but it is never enough to fullfil all those things that each individual consider to be worthwhile.
Each individual person in whatever state of economy they find themselves in, there is never a point where all the resources seems to fulfill everyone's desires or wishes in that country or nation.
Answer:
place and region
Explanation:
hope this helps sorry if not
please give thanks and vote for Brainliest
Poverty is one of the main reasons for social problems but I believe that the worst social problem we have is social inequality, which is the main generator of problems. There is no formula for how to end wealth or social equality given that most people who are rich have no interest in sharing or helping people who have little or almost nothing.
Capitalism generates more and more inequalities, which leads to more poverty, because the rich get richer and the poor get poorer.
The most likely result is Daisy wouldn't develop deep emotional attachment with her mother.
Deep emotional attachment between parents and infant developed due to the Perception that infants have for her mother.
If the parent spent a lot of time taking care of her infant, the infant will perceive the mother as a guardian that always take care of her and someone who could make the infant feel safe.
If, the infant spent the majority of his/her childhood at they care, the emotional attachment that the infants have with the daycare teacher could be deeper than the attachment that they have to thier mother.
Answer:
passive genotype-environment correlation
Explanation:
The passive genotype-environment correlation explains that parents can be a source of genetic and environmental influences. In this system genetically related individuals are exposed to environments that correlate with their genetic predisposition. We can relate this to Johnathon's case, if we think that interest in literature is inherited from both genetics and the environment that Johnathon's parents set for his creation.