1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Mumz [18]
3 years ago
12

Heterogeneous is best describe as

History
1 answer:
zhuklara [117]3 years ago
8 0

Heterogeneous is best described as a product of thing composed of <em>diverse character or continent. </em>

For example:

a + a = homogeneous because the letters are both the same

while

a + b = heterogeneous because the components are different, diverse.

Hope I helped, message me if you have questions.

You might be interested in
Which concerns of the Anti-Federalists were satisfactorily resolved in the Constitution?
NNADVOKAT [17]
The primary concern of the Anti-Federalists was that the Constitution would take power away from the people, so they insisted on including a Bill of Rights, which explicitly outlined the most essential rights for citizens. 
6 0
3 years ago
The declaration of independence asserts that the rights of men are?
Ksju [112]
All men are free. Except for colored men and women. The Declaration never gave them any specific rights. Only the white men.
5 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is one similarity among the ways minority groups, such as Hispanics, American Indians, gays, lesbians, the elderly, and Asi
allochka39001 [22]

Answer:

the correct answer should be A

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Contrasting Why did the war affect life in the South more than in the North?
MrRa [10]
Manufacturing required commodities for both soldiers and civilians was more challenging for the South than it was for the North. As a result, Southern people likely had to make more substantial sacrifices than Northern civilians during the war.
6 0
3 years ago
Why were longer periods of enlistment preferred by Scott?
Nostrana [21]
<span> <span>he War of 1812 sent the Army of the young republic a decidedly mixed message of valor and glory interspersed with cowardice and blunders. The performance of both regulars and militia had been very uneven, although each improved as the conflict drew to a close. In a sort of role reversal, what glory did appear from the victories on the Niagara frontier in 1814 had gone not to the fabled citizen-soldier but to the oft-despised professional. Admittedly, the militia, when properly led as during the Battle of New Orleans, had on occasion done well; but after the war many military realists questioned the ability of the Army to employ him effectively. There were several reasons for this. It was extremely hard to obtain from state governments accurate figures on how many militiamen were available. Another critical limitation on their effectiveness was that since militiamen by their very nature were citizen-soldiers, they did not necessarily live close to where fighting would occur, especially if that were on the frontier. Moreover, the states jealously kept control of arming, disciplining, and training their militia and resisted having the men serve out of state. Though training was crucial, the War Department was limited to making recommendations and supplying training manuals. The Army could not enforce the type of rigorous training that had enabled Bvt. Maj. Gen. Winfield Scott to convert regular soldiers, some of them as raw as militiamen, into the professionals who had excited the admiration of even the British at Chippewa and Lundy’s Lane. 
      For the thirty years after the War of 1812 to the beginning of the Mexican War, the Army of the United States would slowly and painfully evolve into a professional force with generally recognized standards of training, discipline, and doctrine. The first branch schools would open their doors. The U.S. Military Academy would turn out highly motivated professional officers, many of whom were trained engineers, to lead the Army. The new officer corps, including many experienced </span></span>

<span>
Rare Pattern 1812 Bell Crown Shako
Manufactured ca. 1830 veterans of the War of 1812 who had supplanted the superannuated veterans of the Revolutionary War, would gain an increased sense of identification as a corporate body of professionals. These officers, tested in countless postings on the expanding frontier and bloodied in the Creek and Seminole Wars, would serve as a skilled cadre, ready when called upon in 1846 to lead a "lightning war" of conquest against Mexico that would vastly increase the size of the United States.</span>
3 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • The French resistance movement against Germany in World War II was led by who
    6·1 answer
  • What can happen if the president chooses th veto a law that has been passed
    15·2 answers
  • What was a result of the conquest of Constantinople?
    8·1 answer
  • Sumner was physically attacked by Brooks in Congress because ___________________ .
    10·2 answers
  • In the years following World War I, the Red Scare played a key role in the following political changes EXCEPT A) led to increase
    15·2 answers
  • What is the Unilateral Foreign Policy
    8·2 answers
  • how do you become a monter in this plz tell me and the question is what is the date purl harbor happen.
    12·1 answer
  • Focus Questions: What Is Insurrection?
    10·1 answer
  • What did Panchayat Rulers do to sustain the rule?​
    14·1 answer
  • An example of cultural diffusion in relationship to india is . . . a. deciding to switch to metal weapons instead of wooden ones
    14·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!