Answer:
c. The systematic risk of a portfolio can be effectively lowered by adding T-bills to the portfolio.
Explanation:
If we want to less the systematic risk of the portfolio so we have to add the t-bills so that the systematic risk could be minimized
The other statements that are mentioned are incorrect as for risk these statements are wrong
So only c option would be considered as correct
Hence, the correct option is c.
Answer:
GDP is the value of the total production of final goods and services produced within a country (in this case Ireland), while Gross National Product (GNP), in this specific case, is the value of the total production of final goods and services produced by residents of the Ireland (individuals or businesses).
Since several corporations have international headquarters in Ireland due to special tax regimes, e.g. Apple, Microsoft, Google, Intel, Pfizer, FB, etc., and many of those corporations manage all their world trade (except local trade in the US) through those offices, they are very large and wealthy.
Answer: Higher; Comparative advantage
Explanation:
A country or a firm has a comparative advantage in producing a commodity if the opportunity cost of producing that commodity in terms of other commodities is lower than the other country or firm.
Opportunity cost is the benefit that is foregone for an individual by choosing one alternative over other alternatives available to him.
If the opportunity cost is lower for an individual then this will benefit him whereas if the opportunity cost is higher then this will not benefit the individuals.
Therefore,
United states's Opportunity cost of producing a pair of shoes = 
= 5 apples have to be foregone for producing a pair of shoes
Canada's Opportunity cost of producing a pair of shoes = 
= 2 apples have to be foregone for producing a pair of shoes
Hence, Canada has a comparative advantage in producing pairs of shoes because Canada's opportunity cost of producing a pair of shoes is lower than United states opportunity cost.
Answer:
$87 million
Explanation:
The projected benefit obligation (PBO) is a measurement of the present amount of money needed by a company to cover future pension liabilities. PBO uses how long the employee will work and any increased future obligations to the employee's pension.
Given that:
PBO at the beginning of the year = $80 million
Service cost for the year = $10 million
Interest = Discount rate × PBO at beginning of the year = 5% × $80 million = 0.05 × $80 million = $4 million
Actuarial (gain) Loss = Amount paid - Expected money = $5 million - $4 million = $1 million
Benefits paid paid by trustees = $6 million
The total pension expense for the year = PBO at year beginning + Service cost + interest - Actuarial (gain) Loss - benefits = $80 million + $10 million + $4 million - $1 million - $6 million = $87 million
Answer:
MERCOSUR may have made trade more difficult.
Explanation:
It is a trade divergence due to numerous reasons. It influences nations outside the association since they can't offer to those nations as effectively. The idea was to make a worker's union that would enable every nation to get off their feet and strengthen one another. Yet, it winded up harming one another and different nations for the reasons that it made the trade even more difficult than it was before. So, the impacts of MERCOSUR on firms operation are negative; it made trade more difficult, especially with other countries.
