Given information is not enough to answer your question appropriately. Let me start explaining with the cases that we can extract from given information:
Case 1: Stacy was driving the car - in this case, Stacy was in driver seat.
Case 2: Someone else was driving the car - in this case, Stacy was in passenger seat.
Answer:
The sentence which correctly uses the word "coma" as it might be found in Brianna's textbook is:
C. The coma of the comet consists of ice particles and interstellar dust.
Explanation:
The definition in Brianna's textbook clearly refers to "coma" as being that dust cloud that surrounds a comet. Therefore, we need to find a sentence that somehow mentions a comet's coma.
Sentences A and D can be eliminated since they refer to the coma a person gets into after an accident or due to an illness, for example. Sentence B refers to punctuation marks. In this case, it should be "comma" and not "coma". We can eliminate it as well. We are left with option C, which is the only one that uses coma in the sense found in the glossary. It clearly speaks of the coma of a comet.
<u>Answer:</u>
<em>Roosevelt’s goal in the passage is to persuade the general assembly to pass the UDHR at the fourth session. </em>
<em></em>
<u>Explanation:</u>
This is because the soviet proposal is made in order to defer the consideration of the declaration in the 4th session of the assembly. There must be approval by the assembly in the 4th session before the declaration of the rights is too late. There was rejection of the committee because of the different facts and finally it was passed in the 4th session.
I think maybe, the issue is the lack of emotional resonance, and the use of terms like “or anything”. Younger people tend to use these terms, and have less power in the emotional realm, at least when it comes to expressing themselves. So, maybe try lessening the terms that are flounce-y and deepen the emotional aspect of this essay, possibly? Just suggestions from an outside eye, good luck!
The correct answer is answer A ("The focus of the speech stays on Wiesel's terrifying experiences as a child").
<u>By using the third person, Wiesel is able to separate himself from his present self, and take us back to the perspective he had at the time being a young boy</u>. By using the third person, the focus moves away from himself and what sticks with us is the harshness of these experiences that countless nameless boys had to go through.
Hope this helps!
