If the underlined pronoun is who, then the answer is C) subject. If the underlined pronoun is you, then the answer is indirect object.
Answer: "Two friends of mine are Kenji and Jose" is the grammatically correct sentence.
Explanation: In this sentence, "are" acts as the linking verb. It is a form of the linking verb "to be". However, "to be" has another form, "is". The type of verb to be used can usually be determined by how the sentence sounds.
The main way of deciding the verb to use is to relate it to the noun which is performing the action. If the noun itself is singular, "is" must be used whereas for plural nouns "are" is to be used.
When the form of verb is in accordance to the subject, it is called subject-verb agreement.
In the given sentence, the subjects are the two friends Kenji and Jose. Thus, the subject is plural. As a result, "are" is used and the correct sentence is "Two friends of mine are Kenji and Jose".
To learn more about linking verbs, refer to this link:
brainly.com/question/14955768
Answer:A
Explanation:
Because he wants to know what happened the few days he was gone. For him to catch up with whats been happening he would have to read the newspaper because a history book goes way back. An editorial only talks about that controversial issue and biography won’t tell you the events just tell you about a person. Hope this helps:)
This 'short essay' is basically asking you create a piece of writing, convincing your audience of your point. For example; I firmly believe that every single country should not have nuclear bombs. In general, I'd include:
*Nuclear Bomb Simulator to give an image I how much damage it does. What this does is, people tend to hate destructive behaviours. By showing them how much damage it does, you're appealing to their sense of emotion by conjuring a sense of panic.
*Death counts from previous wars to further reinforce the emotion of panic, sadness, and awareness. Death count for those individuals who demand solid scientific evidence.
In a nutshell, basically, include statistics (supports your argument with logical data that's already proven), history from past events if possible (to appeal to one's emotions), and if possible, choose evidence that's more modernized to further prove your point. Why so? Simply because it proves that the problem still persists, no matter how advanced in technology we are. in this case, nuclear bombs are going to be dangerous, regardless of how "modernized" we all are.
The awnser is team because a team is a group of people.
