The answer is <u>"extraordinary claims".</u>
Critical thinking is basically about directing one's very own considerations to expand justification while handling data through using a wide scope of information about an offered subject to touch base at a significant, exact and valid end.
In the event that you frequently recognize as a cynic, you may as of now be en route to turning into an effective basic scholar. This is on account of basic scholars can't simply acknowledge thoughts as realities without having all the data to process and discover rationale in.
False because I just looked it up
Cross-examination when the lawyer is questioning a witness
Answer:
The results of a case study are not generally applicable.
Explanation:
A case study is a methodology within social science that focuses on one particular case. This methodology presents both advantages and disadvantages that are related with the results. Because the researcher concentrates solely on one case, the results can have a lot of depth and the researcher can have a deeper comprehension of it.
However, the results are also very particular, responding to the social, economical and political context as well as characteristics that are unique to that one case. Therefore, the researcher must make explicit that the results are not generally applicable to other cases.
Answer:
- cognitive complexity
- cultural awareness
- divergent thinking ability
- translating spoken languages
Explanation:
Studies have pointed to the reasonable benefits of learning more than one language for children. Complex cognitive development tends to gain the most from dual language proficiency. Bilingual people are used to having their brains switch back and forth between different language systems. When a child speaks more than language, they have the potential to relate with others across different cultures in a way that is not available to monolinguals. They will actually experience another culture, rather than simply being told about it.