Answer:
There is little publicity compared with Acts of Parliament which may mean people are unaware a ruling exists. Control by Parliament isn't always effective. Few affirmative resolutions exist and MP's are too busy to look over them, and controls are often not used anyway. There is a lack of scrutiny.
Explanation:
Answer:
Civil acts right of 1991
Explanation:
The civil acts right enforces laws to prevent unfair treatment during employment and on the job due to sex, race, color, religion, national origin, disability, or age. Passed by Congress in 1991, this act advocates for fairness in employment matters and banned discrimination against the disabled in employment.
This preferential treatment of Jacqueline by Robert because she is African American goes against the 1991 civil act right.
Answer:
B. Employers are not liable for the acts of their supervisors, regardless of whether the employer is aware of the sexual harassment act.
Explanation:
In this case, the Supreme Court mentioned that an employer isat risk. That means that the empolyer does nor have a defense when sexual harassment by a supervisor involves a tangible employment action. Courts hope that employers educate supervisors so they do not commit any type of behavior that could be considered as sexual harassment. Also, all employees must be educated so as to understand their rights and responsibilities .
Answer:
In American jurisprudence, impossible crime is punished as attempted crime. He can be convicted of an attempt to commit the substantive crime where the elements of attempt are satisfied.
Answer:it seems like you answered the question yourself?
Explanation:
