Domestic violence is the standard used for insanity defense to produce good result and Doing the same thing over and over again expecting a change but never changing anything is the standard used for least use of insanity defense.
Explanation:
The advantage of insanity defense is that the accused could avoid penalized with death, even if he is guilty. In the context of crime the sentence is very convenient as compared with an accused who is proven to be guilty, but it is not proven.
The insanity defense is rarely used because of the difficulty in providing legal insanity. Many criminal defendants suffer from mental illness and produce evidence of this illness such as psychiatric testimony.
Hence, Domestic violence is the standard used for insanity defense to produce good result because it changes person completely and Doing the same thing over and over again expecting a change but never changing anything is the standard used for least use of insanity defense.
You could start by saying “ You would want a job in the field of government because..” and then search up good reasons why you would. give job examples and why someone would chose that
Answer:
True.
Explanation:
The 14th Amendment is an amendment to the constitution of the United States of America and it addresses the issue of civil and legal rights for the African American citizens and slaves who had gained freedom after the American Civil War. The 14th Amendment is made up of the clause known as the equal protection of the laws.
An equal protection is a clause that states and guarantees that no state and local governments shall make or enforce any law which would contravene the privileges, rights or immunities of all persons born or naturalized in the United States of America.
Simply stated, the equal protection guarantees that all citizens will be treated equally by the law. Also, the equal protection clause took effect in the United States of America in 1868.
Answer:
You are the trial judge at the sentencing hearing. If you wish, you can rely on the suppressed confession for a sentence enhancement, in effect imposing the same sentence Bertha would have received for second-degree murder. Should you do so? Why or why not?
b. If you were on the appellate court reviewing Bertha’s sentence imposed as described in (a), would you rule that this sentence is fair?
