1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Ulleksa [173]
3 years ago
13

How was japan before ww2 started?

History
2 answers:
leonid [27]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

U.S. Commodore Matthew Perry opened American trade relations with Japan in 1854. President Theodore Roosevelt brokered a 1905 peace treaty in the Russo-Japanese War that was favorable to Japan. The two signed a Commerce and Navigation Treaty in 1911. Japan had also sided with the U.S., Great Britain, and France during World War I.

During that time, Japan also embarked on forming an empire modeled after the British Empire. Japan made no secret that it wanted economic control of the Asia-Pacific region.

By 1931, however, U.S.-Japanese relations had soured. Japan's civilian government, unable to cope with the strains of the global Great Depression, had given way to a militarist government. The new regime was prepared to strengthen Japan by forcibly annexing areas in the Asia-Pacific. It started with China.

Explanation:

vazorg [7]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

World War II really began when the Japanese army seized Manchuria in 1931. But that was not the starting point of Japanese aggression. Japan started in business as a land-grabbing power in a small way. Twelve years later the Japanese began carving out sections of China, starting with Manchuria in 1931.

You might be interested in
What were the main sources of information that Machiavelli used for his book?
Mekhanik [1.2K]

Answer: The Prince (Italian: Il Principe [il ˈprintʃipe], Latin: De Principatibus) is a 16th-century political treatise written by the Italian diplomat and political theorist Niccolò Machiavelli as an instruction guide for new princes and royals. The general theme of The Prince is of accepting that the aims of princes – such as glory and survival – can justify the use of immoral means to achieve those ends.[1]

From Machiavelli's correspondence, a version appears to have been distributed in 1513, using a Latin title, De Principatibus (Of Principalities).[2] However, the printed version was not published until 1532, five years after Machiavelli's death. This was carried out with the permission of the Medici pope Clement VII, but "long before then, in fact since the first appearance of The Prince in manuscript, controversy had swirled about his writings".[3]

Although The Prince was written as if it were a traditional work in the mirrors for princes style, it is generally agreed that it was especially innovative. This is partly because it was written in the vernacular Italian rather than Latin, a practice that had become increasingly popular since the publication of Dante's Divine Comedy and other works of Renaissance literature.[4][5]

The Prince is sometimes claimed to be one of the first works of modern philosophy, especially modern political philosophy, in which the "effectual" truth is taken to be more important than any abstract ideal. It is also notable for being in direct conflict with the dominant Catholic and scholastic doctrines of the time, particularly those concerning politics and ethics.[6][7]

Although it is relatively short, the treatise is the most remembered of Machiavelli's works and the one most responsible for bringing the word Machiavellian into usage as a pejorative. It even contributed to the modern negative connotations of the words politics and politician in Western countries.[8] In subject matter it overlaps with the much longer Discourses on Livy, which was written a few years later. In its use of near-contemporary Italians as examples of people who perpetrated criminal deeds for politics, another lesser-known work by Machiavelli which The Prince has been compared to is the Life of Castruccio Castracani.

3 0
3 years ago
How did the development of early asian and African civilization compare to the development of early American civilization
daser333 [38]
All human civilization is originated from the African Region and started to migrate to Asia, then to America and Europe
The daily life in the early civilization is actually really similar. And started to differ when they entered the Agricultural period because of the food resource that available near that region (Americans use wheat, Asians used grains, and the Africans used corns)
4 0
3 years ago
What lands did North America explore
aleksley [76]

Answer:

canada,africa, and england

Explanation:

i did this

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which cities became major port cities in the south because of the slave trade
just olya [345]
South Carolina and Columbia
6 0
3 years ago
True or False: the “GI Bill” has a positive impact on college enrollments and home buying in the US.
garik1379 [7]

True!

The GI Bill was an amazing vehicle for returning vets to get into the middle class through home ownership and college degrees.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • 5. The sinking of which of the following ships lead to the U.S. entry into World War I? *
    6·2 answers
  • Which of the following describes the early republican party
    12·1 answer
  • Which of these presidents is most closely associated with the fourteen points?
    14·1 answer
  • Zachary taylor and winfield scott were both
    6·2 answers
  • Can someone help me?
    9·1 answer
  • Which statement most correctly describes surrogacy?
    11·2 answers
  • The Constitution had to be Rewritten after the Civil War to include emancipation true or false?
    7·1 answer
  • What is the biggest fear of mounting conflict with the Russians?
    6·1 answer
  • 15. How did the Oregon Trail get its name
    7·2 answers
  • 5
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!