ctually it tracks the movement from 1848 through a series of obstinated state campaigns in Colorado in the 1890s and beyond. Marilley stresses the adaptability of the abolitionist legacy and admires the size of equal-rights ideology after the Civil War to contain a variety of goals for women, including goals to protect women.
<u><em> Suzanne Marilley’s history of the suffrage movement is referring to the full history from 1820 to 1906. The most innovative contribution comes from the author’s research in the Colorado suffrage victory in 1893, which offers an excellent analysis of state politics. </em></u>
In this case study she closely examines the political context and the array of liberal and illiberal arguments used simultaneously to gain the support of various constituencies. She manage to write about the social context of male control over most features of women's lives. She points to a hypersexualized American popular culture that presents women with “self-actualizing sexuality that still hinges on male approval” and persistent labor discrimination and maintains that the feminism that helped change marriage and possibilities for girls can fulfill its “promise” for social change.
<u><em> She credits feminists who build coalitions to effect social change—for example, the twentieth century abortion reform movement culminating in Roe v. Wade victory represents concerted efforts of “physicians, psychiatrists, and family planning professionals along with activists.” </em></u>
I think it’s D I hope this helps
You are your freind is absolutely right
The ruling I would make on the charge of treason against John Brown, is guilty. Since the belief in transcendentalism is basically to be living on your own and not living under the government many are able to see how this may be illegal and wrong to the government. This also just gives people the opportunity to do whatever they want whether or not it is good or bad. Also, John Brown was convicted of treason due to the murder of five men and inciting a slave insurrection. I understand where John Brown was coming from, in the fact that slavery is wrong and should have been abolished. But there comes a time where we cannot recreate the actions of our enemies to retaliate, we must bring about a peaceful measure to combat these problems or else we become no better than our enemies. Then there was Ralph Waldo Emerson who just so happened to be a transcendentalist. He believed he did not have to live under the government and pay taxes and follow their society rules. He wrote poetry and he was a essayist he led the transcendentalist movement of the mid-19th century. I don't think transcendentalism is the answer to our problems with the government, it just makes it seem like we are acting like children and pretending the problem isn't there or choosing to ignore everything around us and act like we live in a bubble. This is why I believe John Brown should be guilty.
i just added more words to help reach the 250 word count :) hope this helps!
