1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Makovka662 [10]
3 years ago
7

Read the question and materials for the document-based essay on the beliefs of the Populist party. One step of writing document-

based essays is analyzing the documents provided, many of which are primary sources. This activity will help you with that step. Using your knowledge and the documents provided for the question—political cartons, charts, and other documents—make two lists. One list should contain at least four reasons that farmers were discontent with the situations they faced at this time, and the other list should contain at least four evaluations of the validity of their complaints.
History
2 answers:
malfutka [58]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

Reasons for farmers' discontent

In the 1870s, farmers suffered from the lack of money circulating in the economy with which they could invest in land and supplies to do their work.

Many farmers were getting foreclosed on by Eastern bankers.

Farmers had to sell their crops on a market that was driven by the whims of international production cycles.

Railroads charged more to ship farmers' crops to market than they charged big businesses to ship goods.

Evaluation of the validity of farmers' complaints

This is a valid complaint because the nation was trying to recover economically from the Civil War and was unable to balance the farmers' need for "easy money" and the need to control inflation. Farmers were stuck in the middle of this controversy.

Farmers certainly suffered from the greater concentration of wealth in the East, so it was hard for them to go about their business and invest in what they needed; however, it is also not clear that the bankers should extend their credit if that would pose even further risk of loss of capital.

As Laughlin says in his 1896 Atlantic Monthly article, farmers had no way to know how to plant their crops—which means how to invest in land and supplies—in ways that would not result in surpluses and falling prices, so, if they could not get more "soft capital," they should at least have access to information about worldwide production patterns to protect their investments, and the investments of the Eastern bankers. Because Americans, then and now, depend on farmers for the food we eat and the economic exchanges we engage in, we are responsible for their survival, at least in general.ts.

Farmers certainly have a legitimate complaint that they had to pay more for shipping their crops on trains to market than they would earn, although the railroads had the right in a market system to charge what they could and charge big business less if they could ship their goods in bulk with less expense. But if the railroads had not been so financially aggressive and ruthless, it would be easier to sympathize with them and believe they were just being reasonable capitalists.

Explanation:

PLATO ANSWER!

MariettaO [177]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

Transit from traditional to commercial agriculture, the tax burden that derives from the greater requirement of bank credit, dependence on transportation and immigration.

Explanation:

In the last four decades of the nineteenth century they constituted a period of great economic and social transformation for the United States. Suffice it to consider that from 1860 to 1900 the total population increased from 31 to 75 million inhabitants. In these years the economy of the country fell to the agricultural sector, characterized in that the population was rural.

The displacement that was given to the agricultural sector has economic and social implications. For example, the transition from traditional to commercial agriculture was observed, from traditional production to mechanization of production, and from the self-financing of the farmer to its integration into bank and financial credits.

In addition to this, immigration contributed more to the uncomfortable and frightened farmer, who saw in these an unfair competition, since immigrants were incorporated into the worst economic and wage conditions, further depressing the already worse agricultural prices.

Incorporating agriculture into national and international trade meant a tax burden for the farmer, a greater bank credit requirement and a dependence on the means of transport. For the impoverished farmer, his problems came largely from the corrupt government and the government, from the banks in the east, and from the hungry railway companies that raised transportation rates uncontrollably.

This perception was not without foundation. An example, the execution of more than 100,000 mortgages between 1889 and 1892, and until 1890 the government had granted railway companies approximately more than 73 million hectares, more than double what they had given to farmers who they were beneficiaries of the Homestead Law.

After the hegemony of the Republicans, and their clear preference for business interests, irritated farmers could not see in the existing parties but a machinery of political control outside their problems. Thanks to social unrest, what became known as the People's Party, called the populist, began to take shape, which came to the political scene by actively participating in national elections.

The populists expressed their dissatisfaction with those who felt they were victims of the banking and railway corporations, the political parties and the federal government. In this way, they could have no other appreciation of the origin of all their problems except as the product of a conspiracy against them, in which all these subjects participated.

You might be interested in
5. Using context clues from the document, what is an embargo?
NikAS [45]

Answer:

an official ban on trade or other commercial activity with a particular country.

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
How do religions spread?
-Dominant- [34]

Answer:

Explanation:

La generación contemporánea ha visto los avances más extraordinarios del nivel de vida en la historia universal, pero también el triunfo de una sociedad signada por la despersonalización y el consumismo, la devastación del medio ambiente y la posibilidad de autodestrucción de la especie humana. La angustia, la anomia, la soledad y diversos fenómenos de alienación son el reverso de una era caracterizada por el progreso material. En su ética de la conservación y la prevención, Hans Jonas, el gran filósofo de la religión, aseveró que la amenaza de un catástrofe general proviene del exceso de éxito que le ha sido deparado al proyecto de Francis Bacon, que es el designio moderno por excelencia: el dominio sobre la naturaleza para el mejoramiento del destino humano. (El marxismo resultaría ser uno de los más fieles, pero no el mejor ejecutor del ideal de Bacon.) La destrucción ecológica es el fenómeno más visible que nos muestra, de acuerdo a Jonas, los peligros inherentes al programa de conocer es poder, que se basa en una actitud arrogante y al mismo tiempo demasiado optimista en torno a un crecimiento económico y un progreso científico incesantes e irrestrictos1.

Es menester, por consiguiente, una reflexión que nos enseñe otra vez lo problemático del progreso histórico y de toda actividad científico-técnica; una reflexión como la emprendieron Max Horkheimer y Theodor W. Adorno al criticar el optimismo del racionalismo y la Ilustración. Este optimismo parecía totalmente justificado, pues se basaba en los avances constantes y aparentemente imparables de la ciencia, la tecnología y la planificación, lo que hacía a primera vista superfluo todo análisis de la destructividad del progreso2. La genuina religiosidad nunca se dejó impresionar por los logros materiales de la era moderna. En cambio marxistas, liberales, positivistas y hasta anarquistas han creído de buena fe que los adelantos de la ciencia y la tecnología significarían a la larga considerables avances sociales, políticos y culturales, los cuales, a su vez, consolidarían el rumbo del progreso material y harían desaparecer factores anacrónicos e innecesarios como la religión y el nacionalismo3. El pensamiento religioso nos puede ayudar a comprender los límites de nuestro mundo y las limitaciones de nuestra mente, pues nos muestra los peligros derivados de la soberbia humana (la hybris clásica) en el intento de domeñar totalmente la naturaleza y la sociedad y, por consiguiente, nos sugiere la pertinencia de un sentido práctico de modestia frente a los logros más reputados de la civilización moderna4.

No hay que retornar dogmáticamente a filosofías pretéritas, pero sí considerar de nuevo la posición clásica: según Aristóteles la admiración y el asombro fueron los motivos primigenios de la filosofía: la admiración y el asombro entendidos como el anhelo de aprender y la filosofía comprendida como el respeto liminar al universo y la explicación de lo que parece incomprensible para escapar de la ignorancia5. El avance de este tipo de conocimiento, calificado como metafísico, místico o especulativo, ha sido uno de los factores principales para el avance del saber, y no solamente la utilidad o el interés material. El asombro ante el cosmos y frente a las patologías de la sociedad contribuye a generar el espíritu crítico. Según Aristóteles, las ciencias teórico-contemplativas, como la filosofía y la teología, tienen una dignidad superior, más elevada que las disciplinas prácticas y utilitarias, ya que las primeras tienen que ver con una razón global, es decir con una racionalidad que supera su carácter instrumental y que por ello tal vez participa de lo divino6. Por otra parte, todo conocimiento digno de este nombre presupone una duda; el objetivo (telos) de una indagación sólo puede ser vislumbrado por aquél que ha dudado anteriormente7. Y las dudas se originan, por ejemplo, cuando existen opiniones divergentes sobre el mismo asunto, como es el caso paradigmático del carácter, el valor y la significación actual de la religión. Y simultáneamente el auténtico pensamiento religioso ha vislumbrado algunos de los aspectos dilemáticos centrales de nuestra época en realidad, de todos los tiempos8.

e es propio del mito y del arte y la vinculación de ambos con lo sagrado10.

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why was it so easy for Mussolini to take control of Italy?
vladimir1956 [14]

Answer:

at first hesatated to join germany but eventually did

Explanation:

5 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
PLEASE HELP <br> What are some of the things Anne and the others miss while in hiding?
Sav [38]
In hiding, I'd say first of all she missed her friends, her cat, and normal life. She also missed "riding her bike, hearing the birds sing, getting a fresh breath of air, and laughing out loud with her friends". (SOURCE: http://www.kawvalley.k12.ks.us/schools/rjh/marneyg/03_holocaust-projects/03_wright_anne%20frank.htm ) 
6 0
3 years ago
Who was Galen? A. Medieval scientist or B. A Renaissance architect or C. An Ancient Greek Doctor
Mama L [17]

Answer:

C.

Explanation:

Galen was an ancient Greek doctor who was very much famous for medicine

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Sing the map, which sentence correctly compares the middle united states to the western united states? a the middle united state
    6·1 answer
  • What was the main goal of the jim crow laws passed in the south after the end of reconstruction
    5·1 answer
  • Did middle kingdom pharaohs continued their idealized representations as observed with old kingdom pharaohs.
    10·1 answer
  • If an object has a lot of inertia, how does this affect how easy it is to move that object?
    5·1 answer
  • How did feudalism affect the development of cities during the medieval era
    14·1 answer
  • Match each settlement with the reasons people settled there.
    13·2 answers
  • In Judaism, Mecca is a sacred place true or false
    14·2 answers
  • Es verdadero o falso.<br> ¿Buenos Aires fue el centro político y económico de la América Española?
    13·1 answer
  • How did Hitler break the Treaty of Versailles?
    13·1 answer
  • Following the 1963 Supreme Court decision in Gideon v. Wainright, all states began to provide legal representation to defendants
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!