Answer:
Minor v. Happersett (1874)
Explanation:
This court case was presented on appeal by Virginia Minor, a member of the National Woman Suffrage Association, after being denied registration to vote in St. Louis in 1872. She sued Reese Happersett because he was the voting registrar.
The case was not successful at the time, as the Supreme Court ruled that women´s right to vote was not protected by the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, which showed the court was not the place to fight for voting rights for women.
The following actions were centered on the review of state voting laws and the ratification of an amendment to the Constitution. It wouldn´t be until 1920 that Minor v. Happersett was overruled by the Nineteenth Amendment that prohibited discrimination in voting rights based on sex.
Answer:
B. A sound generalization considers more factors than an
oversimplification
Explanation:
Generalization is the expansion of the boundaries of a pattern found in a small piece of reality. Simplification is the omission of details that are not essential to achieve the goal.
When generalizing, concepts of a higher order are introduced while the ‘power’ of description does not drop.
In simplification, exactly what happens is the loss of detail, and nothing more.
It helped people read in their own language, it provided better education, and it helped people read the bible and understand it. :)
<span>C) a black woman trying to exercise her right to vote </span>