1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
kodGreya [7K]
3 years ago
15

How did the Russian Revolution impact World War I?

History
2 answers:
Feliz [49]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

The Russian Revolution had the effect of putting an end to the major arena of fighting on the Eastern Front in World War I.  It temporarily helped the Germans by freeing up troops, but this advantage did not do the Germans much good.  Therefore, the revolution did not really end up making much of a difference in the outcome of the war.

Throughout WWI, the Germans were fighting a two-front war.  They were fighting against France and England in the west and against Russia in the east.  This meant, of course, that they had to divide their military strength between the two fronts.  In 1918, the Bolsheviks concluded the Treaty of Brest-Litovsk with the Germans.  Now, the Eastern Front no longer existed for the Germans.  They could take their troops from that front and throw them into the Spring Offensive that started a few weeks later on the Western Front.  This helped the Germans to some degree.  However, the help that came from bringing the troops from the Eastern Front was negated by the influx of American troops since the US had finally started to get its military fully involved in the war by that time.  Even with the movement of troops from the Eastern Front, the German offensive failed and the Germans lost the war.

Thus, the Russian Revolution did not change the outcome of the war.  It changed some of the details of how the war played out, but it did not change the ultimate outcome.

Explanation:

heres the site https://www.enotes.com/homework-help/what-was-effect-russian-revolution-world-war1-461908

Dmitriy789 [7]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

It forced an armistice between Russia an Germany and led to ending the Eastern Front. A peace agreement followed as Russia surrendered.The Russian Revolution accelerated the fall of the Tsars, and a later greater empire will in turn result :the USSR.

Explanation:

The Russian Revolution accelerated the fall of the Tsars, who were fighting against Germany in disproported strength. The badly trained Russian troops couldnt stand a match. So the participation of Russia in World War was seen as a capitalist endeavour. The Russian Revolution did not change the outcome of the war.  It led to significant loss of territorios to the Germans, and diminished Russian presence in the East but it did not change the ultimate outcome. As following years will Russia regain the presence and influence on the lost territories.

The enemies of the Tsars were in and outside its borders, as socialists began spreading the marxist idea and negotiating peace. The Russian Revolution had the effect of putting an end to the major front of fighting on the Eastern Front in World War I. It temporarily helped the Germans by focusing troops in a single front, as they wished. Bolshevik revolution did not really end up making much of a difference in the outcome of the war. It did paved the way for the tensions that would arise in the WW2.

You might be interested in
Why do you think Plato felt he could not have a career in government?
Marrrta [24]

Plato contends we are all made of the same three parts yet not all have the parts aligned in a healthy balance. The result is that greed, ambition, and foolishness rule in these unbalanced people. Plato lived through the democratic period in Athens' government and through the oligarchy period when the conquering Spartans installed the wealthy oligarchists as rulers of Athens, a move that unleashed a fierce retribution of bloodshed upon the unseated democratic rulers.

Plato rejected the rule of the mistake prone and seemingly unreasoning democratic faction and equally rejected the oligarchic rule of the retaliatory wealthy elite. After a period of seclusion, Plato wrote the Republic. In it he describes human nature and uses human nature (as he described it) as a metaphor and template for a reasonable government.

He assigns ruling authority to those who have a functioning alignment and balance between their three constituent parts and a dominant dedication to the highest: (1: lowest) love of money (laboring and merchants classes), (2: middle-most class) love of honor (military), and (3: highest) love of wisdom ("scientists, scholars, high-level experts, and similar sophisticates" [Jorn K. Bramann]).

His idea is that the two models he has seen don't work, so a third is needed. That third model is to make a government out of those who have the best minds by virtue of being best trained, best informed and best balanced (in the quote below, take note of and understand the "or"):

Until philosophers are kings, or the kings and princes of this world have the spirit and power of philosophy, ... cities will never have rest from their evils. (Republic) 


3 0
3 years ago
How did the military strategies of the north compare to those of the south during the capture of port royal
kirill [66]

During the American Civil War, the north and the southern armies had different goals, the Union at the beginning wanted to reunite the country, but later the goal changed to include the abolition of slavery. The Confederacy had a different goal, wanted to incorporate all slave states and secede from the Union.

To win the war the Union had to capture the Confederate territory and the Confederate just wanted to defend its territory.

After the capture of Port Royal, the Union noticed that it would be effective to make an economic pressure into the Confederates and establish a US military depot on the southeastern coast to carry out land and sea operations.

After the win of the Port Royal battle by the Union, the Confederates noticed that the coastline was too big to defend so the Confederates concentrated the defenses further inland, nearer the coastal railroads in the hope that reinforcements could be rushed to any danger point in time to prevent its capture.

4 0
3 years ago
What belief made charles belive he could rule how he saw fit​
nadya68 [22]

Answer: In the Divine Right of Kings led to his dismissing parliament in 1629 and ruling without them. The fact that he did not have a parliament to grant him money meant that he had to tax his people heavier and introduce unpleasant taxes such as ship money (see above).

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
The supreme executive power shall be vested in a governor, who shall be commander-in-chief of all military forces of the state n
Tju [1.3M]
The correct answer for this question is "President."

The position described in the quote above compares closest to the national position of a President of a nation or a country. He shall be commander-in-chief of all military forces of the state not in active service of <span>the United States.</span>
4 0
3 years ago
Someone pls help me I will make you brain
melisa1 [442]

Answer:

the answer is b

Explanation:

please let accept the link i send you i need brainly plus

6 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • In what year did France fall to the nazis <br> A) 1938<br> B) 1942<br> C) 1935<br> D) 1940
    6·1 answer
  • An event that became known as the Boston Massacre occurred on March 5, 1770. On this day, British soldiers fired on and killed
    14·2 answers
  • From where did the farmers of the constitution borrow their ideas about goverment
    10·1 answer
  • What was significant about each of these dates / locations during the French Indian War?
    13·1 answer
  • Croatia is governed by a system in which the prime minister is the active head of the executive branch of government. What type
    8·1 answer
  • An increase in Europe’s food supply led to an(decrease or increase) in peasant population.
    9·2 answers
  • How could the current trade war affect the American economy?
    12·1 answer
  • ¿Cómo era el estilo de la vida de las personas? ¿Cuánto costaban algunos productos?, ¿Qué pensaba la gente acerca de la crisis?
    9·1 answer
  • The British East India Company was considered to be a
    8·2 answers
  • why is it significant that the constitution gives the president the power to command the Armed Forces and Congress the power to
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!