1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
kodGreya [7K]
3 years ago
15

How did the Russian Revolution impact World War I?

History
2 answers:
Feliz [49]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

The Russian Revolution had the effect of putting an end to the major arena of fighting on the Eastern Front in World War I.  It temporarily helped the Germans by freeing up troops, but this advantage did not do the Germans much good.  Therefore, the revolution did not really end up making much of a difference in the outcome of the war.

Throughout WWI, the Germans were fighting a two-front war.  They were fighting against France and England in the west and against Russia in the east.  This meant, of course, that they had to divide their military strength between the two fronts.  In 1918, the Bolsheviks concluded the Treaty of Brest-Litovsk with the Germans.  Now, the Eastern Front no longer existed for the Germans.  They could take their troops from that front and throw them into the Spring Offensive that started a few weeks later on the Western Front.  This helped the Germans to some degree.  However, the help that came from bringing the troops from the Eastern Front was negated by the influx of American troops since the US had finally started to get its military fully involved in the war by that time.  Even with the movement of troops from the Eastern Front, the German offensive failed and the Germans lost the war.

Thus, the Russian Revolution did not change the outcome of the war.  It changed some of the details of how the war played out, but it did not change the ultimate outcome.

Explanation:

heres the site https://www.enotes.com/homework-help/what-was-effect-russian-revolution-world-war1-461908

Dmitriy789 [7]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

It forced an armistice between Russia an Germany and led to ending the Eastern Front. A peace agreement followed as Russia surrendered.The Russian Revolution accelerated the fall of the Tsars, and a later greater empire will in turn result :the USSR.

Explanation:

The Russian Revolution accelerated the fall of the Tsars, who were fighting against Germany in disproported strength. The badly trained Russian troops couldnt stand a match. So the participation of Russia in World War was seen as a capitalist endeavour. The Russian Revolution did not change the outcome of the war.  It led to significant loss of territorios to the Germans, and diminished Russian presence in the East but it did not change the ultimate outcome. As following years will Russia regain the presence and influence on the lost territories.

The enemies of the Tsars were in and outside its borders, as socialists began spreading the marxist idea and negotiating peace. The Russian Revolution had the effect of putting an end to the major front of fighting on the Eastern Front in World War I. It temporarily helped the Germans by focusing troops in a single front, as they wished. Bolshevik revolution did not really end up making much of a difference in the outcome of the war. It did paved the way for the tensions that would arise in the WW2.

You might be interested in
Is it possible for people to be nationalists without becoming fascists?
Ganezh [65]
Yes, it is possible! If you would like more of an explanation I'll be happy to explain! Hope this helps! :) :D 
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did the Tariff of 1828 continue to haunt Jackson's presidency?
Galina-37 [17]

Answer:The Tariff of Abominations was the name outraged southerners gave to a tariff passed in 1828. Residents of the South believed the tax on imports was excessive and unfairly targeted their region of the country.

The tariff, which became law in the spring of 1828, set very high duties on goods imported into the United States. And by doing so it did create major economic problems for the South. As the South was not a manufacturing center, it had to either import finished goods from Europe (primarily Britain) or buy goods made in the North.

Adding insult to injury, the law had obviously been devised to protect manufacturers in the Northeast. With a protective tariff essentially creating artificially high prices, the consumers in the South found themselves at a severe disadvantage when buying products from either Northern or foreign manufacturers.

The 1828 tariff created a further problem for the South, as it reduced business with England. And that, in turn, made it more difficult for the English to afford cotton grown in the American South.

Intense feeling about the Tariff of Abominations prompted John C. Calhoun to anonymously write essays setting forth his theory of nullification, in which he forcefully advocated that states could ignore federal laws. Calhoun's protest against the federal government eventually led to the Nullification Crisis.

Background of the 1828 Tariff

The Tariff of 1828 was one of a series of protective tariffs passed in America. After the War of 1812, when English manufacturers began to flood the American market with cheap goods that undercut and threatened new American industry, the U.S. Congress responded by setting a tariff in 1816. Another tariff was passed in 1824.

Those tariffs were designed to be protective, meaning they were intended to drive up the price of imported goods and thereby protect American factories from British competition. And they became unpopular in some quarters because the tariffs were always promoted originally as being temporary measures. Yet, as new industries emerged, new tariffs always seemed necessary to protect them from foreign competition.

The 1828 tariff actually came into being as part of a complicated political strategy designed to cause problems for President John Quincy Adams. Supporters of Andrew Jackson hated Adams following his victory in the "Corrupt Bargain" election of 1824.

The Jackson people drew up legislation with very high tariffs on imports necessary to both the North and South, on the assumption that the bill would not pass. And the president, it was assumed, would be blamed for the failure to pass the tariff bill. And that would cost him among his supporters in the Northeast.

The strategy backfired when the tariff bill passed in Congress on May 11, 1828. President John Quincy Adams signed it into law. Adams believed the tariff was a good idea and signed it though he realized it could hurt him politically in the upcoming election of 1828.

The new tariff imposed high import duties on iron, molasses, distilled spirits, flax, and various finished goods. The law was instantly unpopular, with people in different regions disliking parts of it, but the opposition was greatest in the South.

John C. Calhoun's Opposition to the Tariff of Abominations

The intense southern opposition to the 1828 tariff was led by John C. Calhoun, a dominating political figure from South Carolina. Calhoun had grown up on the frontier of the late 1700s, yet he had been educated at Yale College in Connecticut and also received legal training in New England.

In national politics, Calhoun had emerged, by the mid-1820s, as an eloquent and dedicated advocate for the South (and also for the institution of slavery, upon which the economy of the South depended).

Calhoun's plans to run for president had been thwarted by lack of support in 1824, and he wound up running for vice president with John Quincy Adams. So in 1828, Calhoun was actually the vice president of the man who signed the hated tariff into law.

Calhoun Published a Strong Protest Against the Tariff

In late 1828 Calhoun wrote an essay titled "South Carolina Exposition and Protest," which was anonymously published. In his essay Calhoun criticized the concept of a protective tariff, arguing that tariffs should only be used to raise revenue, not to artificially boost business in certain regions of the nation. And Calhoun called South Carolinians "serfs of the system," detailing how they were forced to pay higher prices for necessities.

Explanation: thancks

8 0
3 years ago
11. Discrimination and prejudice toward<br> Mexican Americans in the West led to<br> which outcome?
oksano4ka [1.4K]

Prejudice and discrimination towards  Mexican Americans in the west led to the educational backwardness of Mexican Americans.

<u>Explanation:</u>

Mexican Americans came to America as immigrant laborers being forced to suffer the hardships of poverty in their homeland. Economic crisis within the US triggered the development of hostility towards immigrant laborers. Mexican Americans were not considered white or black by the US people.

The Mexican Americans themselves didn’t consider them to be white or black and found it difficult to answer questions about race. Being a stigmatized community that faced discrimination for several years Mexican Americans became educationally backward when compared with the non-Hispanic people.

7 0
3 years ago
Who is the princess of Pop 1999?<br>Need It​
jekas [21]

Answer:

Britney Spears is the princess of Pop 1999.

6 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What it was like when the Europeans got to the New World? add a few sentences to tell that story
castortr0y [4]

Answer:

As the English, French, and Spanish explorers came to North America, they brought tremendous changes to American Indian tribes. ... Diseases such as smallpox, influenza, measles, and even chicken pox proved deadly to American Indians. Europeans were used to these diseases, but Indian people had no resistance to them.

Explanation:

4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Who was elected president of brazil in 2002?
    15·1 answer
  • as life got better in Europe the number of people willing to become indentured servants decreased. how did plantation owners con
    10·2 answers
  • Arms reduction and settling border disputes contributed to the League of Nations’ goal of A. punishing Germany for World War I.
    10·2 answers
  • Can someone help me please in american gov
    9·1 answer
  • The Battle of Saratoga did not allow the British to A. keep the French from joining the war. B. cut off New England from the res
    6·2 answers
  • What was the decisive turning point in the US Civil War that turned the campaic in favor of the Union troops?​
    7·1 answer
  • How Did Popular Culture Change During the 1920s?
    13·2 answers
  • Why did the U.S. Government want to drive the Sioux off their land?
    13·1 answer
  •  please help i’ll give you brainilist and thanks
    10·2 answers
  • Which of these BEST describes who was allowed to vote In Ancient Athens? A) males B) females C) male citizens D) male and female
    10·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!