The main way in which John Marshall's interpretation of the constitution was different from Thomas Jefferson's is that Marshall believed that the Constitution could be interpreted fairly widely, while Jefferson was an "originalist".
It was split up between the Europe’s powers
Answer:
Hello. You have not shown the answer options, which makes it impossible for this question to be answered accurately. However, we can affirm that a good counterclaim would be one that showed that the campaign for the female suffrage started long before the defaced penny and that it was disrespectful to disfigure the king's face in the coin, since the female suffrage also cried out for respect.
Explanation:
A counterclaim is an argument that wishes to combat the opposite argument, stated earlier, showing arguments that prove that the previously stated claim is incorrect and / or incomplete, not providing true facts, but proving to be questionable and contradictory.
However, Counterclaim must present facts that show that it is correct and that it is relevant to the debate in question.
The only one that is right would be a
Answer:
It recognized that government policy had inhibited the practice of Native American religions, including access to sacred sites and use of sacred objects and materials.
