The correct answer to this question is "as different as possible." Karen is a judge hearing the case of local dispatch co. v. national transport corp. applying the relevant rule of law to the facts of the case requireskaren to find previously decided cases that, in relation to the case under consideration, are <span>as different as possible</span>
Both religions share several religious books
IT helps us to be able to vote without being denied by the united states
Well, for one, women didn't really want the right to vote (at least not all -- anti-suffragettes were not in favor). One of the major reasons that they did not want the right to vote is that it could bring them into conscription or other war-related activities (which anti-suffragettes were not particularly fond of). Domestic life also seemed more amiable for a lot of women, who were not particularly interested in the state of politics.
As for general anti-arguments, you have the fact that many people did not believe that women would be as knowledgeable on voting/politics as men (also why rich and high-class women were given the right to vote before those who were of a poorer class).
The Voting Rights Act of 1965, signed into law by President Lyndon B. Johnson<span>, aimed to overcome legal barriers at the state and local levels that prevented African Americans from exercising their right to vote as guaranteed under the 15th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution</span>
