The Roman society was divided into three major social groups: patricians; plebeians; women and slaves;
Explanation:
The social structure in Rome, as in many ancient empires, was anything but fair or well structured. The society was roughly divided into three major groups. Those three groups were:
- patricians
- plebeians
- women and slaves
The patricians were the ones that controlled and ruled the society and they had all the rights in Rome. The plebeians were all the other people, or rather all other men in Rome, and they had some rights, but had to pay tax and serve in the military for them. These two groups had Roman citizenship.
The last group, women and slaves, was a group consisted of all of the women and all of the slaves in Rome. They had no rights whatsoever, and even if someone murdered them there were no consequences. They were also not given Roman citizenship.
They must assume that the are not that good in the business industry
Answer:
What are two or more examples of African Amo or more examples of African Americans’ efforts to solve the problem of discrimination
Hold on, our servers are swamped. Wait for your answer to fully load.
ericans’ efforts to solve the problem of discrimination
Explanation:What are two or more examples of African Americans’ efforts to solve the problem of discrimination
What are two or more exampleWhat are two or more examples of African Americans’ efforts to solve the problem of discriminations of African Americans’ efforts to solve thWhat are two or more examples of African Americans’ efforts to solve the problem of discriminatione problem of discrimination
Answer:
That argument is an example of a falacy masquerading as a valid inference.
Explanation:
Fallacy means error, deception or falsehood. Usually a fallacy is a misconception that is conveyed as true, misleading others. On the other hand, when an argument conveying a true idea is used to derive a false conclusion from false assumptions, the inference is valid.
Based on this, we can conclude that the argument quoted in the above question is a fallacy disguised as valid inference, because the speaker of the argument provides the information as a true statement, but it is wrong to draw conclusions about how Anthony will react after his accident, based on how other people reacted.
Answer:
A situational attribution
Explanation:
A situational attribution is the tendency of assigning the cause or responsibility of a certain behavior or action to outside forces rather than international characteristic and we often explain our new actions and behavior using the environmental or situational features, meaning something that is beyond our control.
Every form of explanation we come up with that focuses on the environment in order to explain behavior can also be referred as situational attributes.
