1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
bogdanovich [222]
3 years ago
13

What is the factor of 89

Mathematics
1 answer:
klasskru [66]3 years ago
6 0

Answer: 89 has no factor other than 1 and 89

Step-by-step explanation:

You might be interested in
How is the equation Y= 2X similar to the equation Y = 2X +3. how is it different
Svetlanka [38]

Answer:

2x in common (slope)

Step-by-step explanation:

similar because they both have a slope of 2

different because the 2nd equation has a y intercept of 3

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Adam went to Target and bought items for $45.05, $9.29, and $0.89. How much did these three
andriy [413]
The answer is 55. 23 dollars because if you add 45.05
+. 9.29
—————————
54.34
+. 0. 89
—————————
55.23
5 0
3 years ago
John purchases goods for R450.00 including VAT . Calculate the amount he pays for VAT
Nady [450]

Answer:

Whats the percentage of the VAT?

8 0
3 years ago
A data mining routine has been applied to a transaction dataset and has classified 88 records as fraudulent (30 correctly so) an
chubhunter [2.5K]

Answer:

The classification matrix is attached below

Part a

The classification error rate for the records those are truly fraudulent is 65.91%.

Part b

The classification error rate for records that are truly non-fraudulent is 96.64%

Step-by-step explanation:

The classification matrix is obtained as shown below:

The transaction dataset has 30 fraudulent correctly classified records out of 88 records, that is, 30 records are correctly predicted given that an instance is negative.

Also, there would be 88 - 30 = 58 non-fraudulent incorrectly classified records, that is, 58 records are incorrectly predicted given that an instance is positive.

The transaction dataset has 920 non-fraudulent correctly classified records out of 952 records, that is, 920 records are correctly predicted given that an instance is positive.

Also, there would be 952 - 920 = 32 fraudulent incorrectly classified records, that is, 32 records incorrectly predicted given that an instance is negative.

That is,

                                                                            Predicted value

                           Active value                 Fraudulent       Non-fraudulent

                              Fraudlent                         30                       58

                          non-fraudulent                   32                     920

The classification matrix is obtained by using the information related to the transaction data, which is classified into fraudulent records and non-fraudulent records.

The error rate is obtained as shown below:

The error rate is obtained by taking the ratio of \left( {b + c} \right)(b+c) and the total number of records.

The classification matrix is, shown above

The total number of records is, 30 + 58 + 32 + 920 = 1,040

The error rate is,

\begin{array}{c}\\{\rm{Error}}\,{\rm{rate}} = \frac{{b + c}}{{{\rm{Total}}}}\\\\ = \frac{{58 + 32}}{{1,040}}\\\\ = \frac{{90}}{{1,040}}\\\\ = 0.0865\\\end{array}  

The percentage is 0.0865 \times 100 = 8.65

(a)

The classification error rate for the records those are truly fraudulent is obtained by taking the rate ratio of b and \left( {a + b} \right)(a+b) .

The classification error rate for the records those are truly fraudulent is obtained as shown below:

The classification matrix is, shown above and in the attachment

The error rate for truly fraudulent is,

\begin{array}{c}\\FP = \frac{b}{{a + b}}\\\\ = \frac{{58}}{{30 + 58}}\\\\ = \frac{{58}}{{88}}\\\\ = 0.6591\\\end{array}  

The percentage is, 0.6591 \times 100 = 65.91

(b)

The classification error rate for records that are truly non-fraudulent is obtained by taking the ratio of d and \left( {c + d} \right)(c+d) .

The classification error rate for records that are truly non-fraudulent is obtained as shown below:

The classification matrix is, shown in the attachment

The error rate for truly non-fraudulent is,

\begin{array}{c}\\TP = \frac{d}{{c + d}}\\\\ = \frac{{920}}{{32 + 920}}\\\\ = \frac{{920}}{{952}}\\\\ = 0.9664\\\end{array}

The percentage is, 0.9664 \times 100 = 96.64

8 0
3 years ago
Saturn has how many rings
Ahat [919]
3 fainter narrow rings
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Does anyone know how to graph this !!????!!
    8·1 answer
  • What is the best estimate for the product of 289 and 7
    7·2 answers
  • A wise man once said “200 reduced by twice my age is 42” What is his age ?
    13·2 answers
  • Brianna's teacher asks her which of these three expressions are equivalent to each other.
    15·2 answers
  • Freddy is buying wings and nachos for a party. A box of 10 wings cost $7.00. Nachos cost $4.00 per tray. He must spend less that
    8·1 answer
  • What is 16/20 simplified
    15·2 answers
  • you are going to purchase a corvette for 60,000, the interest rate is 8% and you will be paying off the loan in 5 years what wil
    9·1 answer
  • The radius of a quarter circle is 1 mile. What is the quarter circle's perimeter?
    10·1 answer
  • X + y =7<br>x - y= 1<br><br>find X and Y​
    15·2 answers
  • The sum of three consecutive odd numbers is 99.<br> What is the smallest of the three numbers ?
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!