Answer:
Wikipedia is not a reliable source. Wikipedia can be edited by anyone at any time. This means that any information it contains at any particular time could be vandalism, a work in progress, or just plain wrong. ... Wikipedia generally uses reliable secondary sources, which vet data from primary sources.
Explanation:
Wikipedia is ideal in these situations because it will allow you to find the information, as well as sources which you can research to confirm that information. In any case, you should not cite Wikipedia itself, but the source provided; you should certainly look up the source yourself before citing it.
Why is Wikipedia a good place to begin?
While the wisdom of the crowd doesn't always rule when it comes to objective, fact-based research and writing (unless you're writing a report on Wookies), Wikipedia offers a good way to get your head around a topic and to start narrowing down your research focus so that you can switch to using more commonly accepted .\
My answer is a. He has already been to the asteroid
Answer:
d. Superiority
Explanation:
The response in the statement falls under the Gibb's communication concept of 'superiority'. In this concept type, superiority is a kind of defensive approach or behavior in communication. The sens of superiority occurs when the speaker thinks he is more accomplished in communication than the listener for whom the message is conveyed. 'I have done this a million times' in the statement reveals an air of superiority and the speaker can do it all alone, and without the help of anyone.
