Answer:
By evaluating opposing arguments, scientific claims can be examined and strengthened.
Explanation:
The purpose of argument is to establish a better, more accurate conclusion. This is demonstrated in the given scenario: because there is disagreement, scientists work hard to find conclusive evidence towards one point or another.
Why not B: It doesn't really depend on conflicting data, though a bigger sample size and more groups helps to get a wider representation. You want your results to gradually converge.
Why not C: This is so untrue! Disagreement is key to healthy discussion and honing down scientific points.
Why not D: Two scientists can disagree; this doesn't flat-out disprove hypotheses. What it does is cast light on their discrepancy and lead them to improve their conclusions or do more research.
Answer:
The insecticide must have contain strong, active chemicals that are poisonous and harmful to owls which resulted in their demise while on the other hand, grass hopper or mice may be resistant/ or tolerant to that chemicals that's why it don't have effect on them.
Explanation:
Answer:
The correct answer would be protista.
Explanation:
The kingdom Protista includes the unicellular eukaryotes. Protists are a diverse kingdom of living beings that are mostly unicellular but some are multicellular. These multicellular organism does not show highly specialized tissues organization.
They show similar characteristics to animals, plants or fungi. Protists can be heterotrophic or autotrophic such as algae, kelp, Paramecium.
Thus, the correct answer is Protista
I believe the answer to this would be OO genotype.
If an individual with wavy hair mates with an individual with straight hair, what is the probability that their child will have curly hair? ... curly hair and an individual with (naturally) straight hair mate; all of their offspring have (naturally) wavy hair.