1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
mario62 [17]
3 years ago
14

What was the ruling of the dred scoot decision

History
1 answer:
rosijanka [135]3 years ago
7 0
Dred Scott decision, formally Dred Scott v. John F.A. Sandford, legal case in which the U.S. Supreme Court on March 6, 1857, ruled that a slave, who had resided in a free state and territory was not thereby entitled to his freedom; that African Americans were not and could never be citizens of the United States; and that the Missouri Compromise , which had declared free all territories west of Missouri and north of latitude 36°30′, was unconstitutional. If you need more informaion go to https://www.britannica.com/event/Dred-Scott-decision and it should help out alot .
You might be interested in
Which country had the most land in North America ?
PtichkaEL [24]
This is the current status. Canada: 9,984,670 sq km
8 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
1. Which of the following did the Roman republic and Greek democracy have in common?
OleMash [197]

Answer: it’s B and E

Explanation: just took quiz

4 0
3 years ago
110,000 ________________Americans were forcibly uprooted from their West Coast homes to be sent to remote relocation camps.
nataly862011 [7]

Is the Japanese because of the incident that happend


8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did hobbes and locke differ in their views on the role of government?
storchak [24]
Thomas Hobbes thought that all humans were naturally selfish and greedy, and needed the power of an absolute ruler to hold them back. He thought that the people should obey the rulers every word. Locke said that a true government was meant to protect all natural rights of a person, and that the people had to have a voice in government. He was against the monarchy, because he believed that it was not protecting the natural rights of the people, and reversely, going against them.
3 0
3 years ago
Giving brainliest {{{ Need help}}}
stira [4]

Answer: B

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why were many people willing to endure the hardships of settling in the far est?
    6·1 answer
  • Como eum.edsunuty com/Play
    12·1 answer
  • Select the six weaknesses of the Articles of Confederation.
    13·2 answers
  • Why did it take the states so long to ratify the Articles of Confederation
    8·1 answer
  • After the french and indian war how did enland try to pay for the cost of the war
    12·2 answers
  • Prompt
    13·1 answer
  • (PLEASE HELP)
    9·1 answer
  • Anyone tryna help the kid out on this....??
    6·1 answer
  • Koi hai kya??????????​
    9·1 answer
  • Please help me with this asap
    11·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!