This makes Rudy feel good about himself and his group. This is the ego-defensive function of stereotypes.
- The ego-defensive function shields the person from danger by hiding their "real" selves and any socially inappropriate desires and feelings.
- The functional theory of attitudes includes it as one of the functions of attitudes.
- The term "ego-defensive function" refers to having beliefs that defend our self-worth or that provide an explanation for behaviors that make us feel bad.
- Children may, for instance, develop a profoundly unfavorable attitude toward all sports as a means of defending themselves against the feelings of humiliation they have encountered in P.E. sessions.
<h3>What are the 4 functions of attitude?</h3>
- The four crucial roles that attitudes play are: (1) the knowledge function; (2) the ego defensive function; (3) the value expressing function; and (4) the adjustment function.
- An individual has wants that must be met in order for him to contribute to society in a useful way.
Learn more about ego-defensive
brainly.com/question/27960808
#SPJ4
Answer:
This paragraph describes the inability of users to read and take the warnings written on products non seriously. Consumers usually do not read the warning labels and without any technical knowledge, they go all in. Similar case happened with the drain cleaner. He did not take the warning seriously and did what he thought was best and when it hit back, he thought of nothing else but to file a law suit.
In addition, this paragraph entails how thoroughly the investigation was carried out through multiple entities to reach the bottom of the issue and then the final judgment was made which was somewhat fair.
I believe the answer to this question is True.
(Hope this helps you! :P )
Answer:
Explanation:
He compares the role of a supreme court justice to that of an umpire in baseball or a referee in football or hockey.
He says for example, that those neutrals would never favor a team for person reasons. A team would never get unfair treatment if they were in a do or die match and had not been in such a match for 50 or more years while their opponents had one this match multiple times. Such behavior would be unthinkable.
He stated that one must uphold the rules as given to him. The idea of a referee or umpire falls apart a little here, but a supreme court justice is not obligated to uphold rules which are unconstitutional. His job is to fairly judge what should be decided. It does not matter what his own thoughts on abortion might be: he must rule on what the constitution would say about such matters.
Sometimes it is not always easy.
