Answer:
First thing, farming technology is less or even not available in context of nepal compare to other country.So they have to use traditional method which is time consuming and more effort and labour work
Another is farmer have to sale there crops in less price to seller because farmer don't have any facility (mostly farmer are uneducated so they don't know about marketting) that is why there gain is less then there efforts
I’m pretty sure that’s a dictator
Arguments that appear to be legitimate but are really founded on poor reasoning are known as logical fallacies. They could be the product of unintentional thinking mistakes or purposely employed to deceive others.
Taking logical fallacies at its value might cause to base our conclusions on weak arguments and result in poor decisions. Some of the text relies on the effectiveness of logical fallacies are :
- The Bandwagon Fallacy: Bandwagon fallacies, such as "three out of four individuals think X brand toothpaste cleans teeth best," are something that most of us expect to see in advertising; nonetheless, this fallacy may easily find its way into regular meetings and conversations.
- The Appeal to Authority Fallacy: Having an authoritative person support your claim might be a strong supplement to an existing argument, but it cannot be the main tenet of your case. Something is not always real just because a powerful person thinks it to be true.
- The False Dilemma Fallacy: The false dilemma fallacy claims that there are only two possible endings, which are mutually incompatible, rather than understanding that most (if not all) topics may be conceived of on a spectrum of options and perspectives.
- The Hasty Generalization Fallacy: This mistake happens when someone makes broad assumptions based on insufficient data. In other words, they ignore plausible counterarguments and make assumptions about the truth of a claim that has some, but insufficient, supporting evidence.
- The Slothful Induction Fallacy: This fallacy happens when there is enough logical evidence to conclude something is true, but someone refuses to admit it, instead attributing the result to coincidence or something completely unrelated.
- The Correlation Fallacy: If two things seem to be linked, it doesn't always follow that one of them caused the other indisputablelly. Even while it can seem like a straightforward fallacy to recognise, it can be difficult to do so in actual practise, especially if you truly want to uncover a link between two pieces of information to support your claim.
To learn more logical fallacies refer
brainly.com/question/18094137
#SPJ4
Answer:
A) Thought Stopping
Explanation:
According to my research on the different cognitive intervention techniques used by different Therapists, I can say that the technique being used by Carrie's therapist is called Thought Stopping. This technique is used in order to stop or get rid of a certain recurring thought. In this case Carrie's therapist is using the image of a red light (traffic Stop Light) in order to halt a certain memory every it comes to mind.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
...... ...................
Explanation:
b
