I encountered this question before but it had choices. The missing choices of this question are:
A- immigration
<span>B-Natural selection </span>
<span>C- Random mutations </span>
<span>D- Geographic isolation
My answer would be C - RANDOM MUTATIONS.
A. Immigration is not applicable because it states There has been no migration in or out of the population in the last 200 years.
B. Natural selection is not applicable because of it states that the recessive allele frequency has been 0%.
D. Geographic isolation is not applicable because it is not a factor in the increase in the recessive allele frequency.
</span>
Answer:
Adversarial System.
Explanation:
An adversarial system or adversary system is the legal procedure under which the parties present their cases before a judge or jury. The advocates of the two parties gather information, pieces of evidence, witnesses, etc that are to be present before the judge. The case is present before a person or a group of people who would be impartial and after seeing the evidences pass the judgment which they find to be true.
So, according to the definition provided and the statement given in the question the answer is adversarial system or adversary system.
Answer:
More, had a comparative advantage, produce more
Explanation:
In the previous example, the United States and Brazil were efficient when they specialized. Brazil choose to specialize in the production of bananas because it in producing it. The United States and Brazil when they specialize.
The power to recognize foreign nations is best categorized as part of the role of head diplomat, although lots of this responsibility falls to the Secretary of State.
Answer: In differential reinforcement of alternative behavior (DRA), it is possible for the problem behavior and reinforced behaviour to coexist while in differential reinforcement of incompatible behavior (DRI), it is not.
Explanation:
Differential reinforcement of alternative behavior (DRA) and differential reinforcement of incompatible behavior (DRI) are both ways to reduce or eliminate unsatisfactory behavior. They aim to change behavior by substituting unwanted behavior with target behavior and removing the reinforcement of unwanted behavior
.
The difference between DRA and DRI is the compatibility of the behavior that is being reinforced with the existing behavior. While DRA shows an alternative way to behave, DRI only reinforces behavior incompatible with the problem behavior. An example of DRA is is telling a student to raise her hand instead of shouting in class. Here, both of these behaviors are compatible. An example of DRI is telling a child who has a habit of talking while eating to do one or the other.
