OPEC, its the countries that make/ produce oil for us. They are mostly in the Middle East
The correct answer is A. The constitution had strong support but also strong opposition.
Explanation
In the image, you can see three newspaper headlines that expose some of the situations that occurred during the ratification of the United States Constitution. One of them says "Constitution Ratified in Delaware" suggesting a general acceptance of the Constitution in this State. The second says "Pennsylvania Anti-Federalist Object to Constitution" expresses an idea of opposition to federalism in Pennsylvania. Finally, the headline of the third newspaper reads "Tough Debate Over Constitution in Connecticut" suggesting a fierce debate in which not everyone agreed or against this Constitution and in which several points were discussed. According to the above, it can be established that the correct answer is A. because the incumbents do not express a radical opinion of approval or disapproval of the Constitution.
Was located in Northeast Africa just south of Ancient Egypt. The main cities of Kush were situated along the Nile River, the White Nile River, and the Blue Nile River. Today, the land of Kush is the country of Sudan. How long did the Kingdom of Kush rule? The Kingdom of Kush lasted for over 1400 years. It was first established around 1070 BCE when it gained its independence from Egypt. It quickly became a major power in Northeast Africa. In 727 BCE, Kush took control of Egypt and ruled until the Assyrians arrived. The empire began to weaken after Rome conquered Egypt and eventually collapsed sometime in the 300s CE.
Answer:
the distance from the ocean is a major factor that contributes in variation of temperature.
elevation of the city is another major factor resulting in variation of climate.
Explanation:
Answer:
1. The author uses the words "undefined", "unbounded" and "immense" to describe the powers of the constitution.
2. Upset: it makes the Congress even more powerful than it’s previous long list of expressed powers
3. A Bill of Rights is necessary to protect the rights of citizens. The proposed Constitution does not do enough.
4. Yes he does, and it matters because if you don’t trust the people in power you wouldn’t have a real nation.
5.He seems more like an Anti-Federalist.
Part Two
1. Unnecessary and dangerous
2. From the Federalist No.84
3. No because he believes that its unnecessary and not needed in the constitution.
4. That the bill of rights is pointless and not realistic for the American people.
5 He is defiantly Anti-Federalist; He goes against everything Federalism is for.
