Hmm, a strong argument typically includes a statement of one's own opinion, then your opponent's counterclaim, and reasons why the counterclaim is inaccurate or invalid. For instance, Tammy could have started off with a statement about how animal safety benefits the animals, and then address the counterclaim about it being expensive by stating it doesn't just help the animals, but the people as well. I think the answer here is false because Tammy's speech didn't include an argument about how expensive animal safety is. So false. I hope this helps, sorry it's so long.
Answer:
1. wife
2. bought
3.Can I open a window? It's hot in here
4.Do you like
5. Can I have a coffee, please?
<em>Hope</em><em> </em><em>it</em><em> </em><em>helps</em>
B) Irving is condemning the colonists’
mistreatment of others.
<span>We know the answer is not “A” because Irving
would, thus, need to be praising the devil since he attributes the persecutions
to the devil as the devil mentions he presides at the persecutions. We know the answer is not “C” because
superstition is not innately evil and is considered silly to some, and there is
nothing silly about the killing those found guilty during the persecutions of
the Quakers and Anabaptists. We know “D”
is not the answer because there is no mention as to how colonists view the devil.
There is mention of how the devil is
known in other countries; the only mention of the devil and the colonists is
how the devil mentions he presides at persecutions. Thus, we know that “B” is the best response because
to describe actions as those being watched over and encouraged by the devil is a condemnation
insinuating those taking part are accessories/accomplices to evil. </span>
