1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
OLga [1]
3 years ago
12

You are writing a research paper on strange phenomenon, and you want to use this passage as a source and take notes on it.

English
2 answers:
Brums [2.3K]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

the Correct answer is many strange things happened in Michigan in the 1960's

Explanation:

sp2606 [1]3 years ago
6 0

Answer: A) many strange things happened in Michigan in the 1960's

Explanation:

You might be interested in
What is not one of Mark Antony’s true intentions behind his speech
erastovalidia [21]

Answer: To befriend and support the conspirators.

Explanation:

Mark Antony is a character from Shakespeare's <em>Julius Caesar</em>. He is Caesar's supporter and friend. It is due to his support that Caesar managed to become as successful as he is, and to be the ruler of Rome. However, Roman Senators, including Brutus and Cassius, decide to murder Caesar, as he has become too powerful. Upon Caesar's death, Mark Antony delivers a speech which makes people who loved Caesar both sad and angry, weakens the conspirators' control, and affects the emotions of the audience through the use of demagogic language. Therefore, the purpose of the speech was quite the opposite of befriending and supporting the conspirators.

5 0
3 years ago
Define biography???????​
tekilochka [14]

Answer:

It would include information about the person, his/her name, place of residence, education, occupation, life and activities, as well as other important details. It is the story of the person, always written by someone else and never by the person about whom it is written.

5 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What argument is Gandhi making in this excerpt? How does he construct and support this argument? Font Sizes
horrorfan [7]
Gandhi's trial for sedition, and the subsequent imprisonment that began in March 1922 and ended with his release in January of 1924, marked the first time that he had faced prosecution in India. The judge, C.N. Broomfield, was uncertain what to do with his famous prisoner–Gandhi was clearly guilty as charged, and willingly admitted as much, even going so far as to ask for the heaviest possible sentence. Like many Englishmen, Broomfield developed a liking for the Mahatma, commenting, "even those who differ from you in politics look upon you as a man of high ideals and of noble and even saintly life." He gave Gandhi the lightest sentence possible: six years in prison, which would be later reduced to just two years.

Willingness to accept imprisonment was, of course, an integral part of satyagraha, and Gandhi was perfectly content while in prison. His captors allowed him a spinning wheel and reading material, and save for a bout of appendicitis (which actually hastened his release), he was, he wrote to a friend, "happy as a bird."

Still, it must be noted that during his two-year imprisonment, Gandhi's great nonviolent revolution essentially fell apart. Non-cooperation gradually died away as Indians drifted back to their jobs and routines; the Congress leaders, notably Motilal Nehru and C.R. Das, were participating in local government again; worst of all, Hindu-Muslim unity had fallen apart, and violence rocked many communities. The struggle for Indian independence had run aground on the immense, seemingly insuperable problem of disunity among Indians, who had never been a nation in the Western sense, and remained divided by caste, language, and most of all, religion.

Gandhi's greatest achievement, throughout the '20s, '30s and '40s, was to overcome these differences, to unify India by making himself the symbol of unity. Of course, he never explicitly claimed this role–to do so would have been anathema to his selfless philosophy–yet it was undeniably Gandhi's person, more than the slogans of nationalism and liberation, that united Brahmins and untouchables, Hindus and Muslims in the struggle against the British. His amazing personal determination served as a beacon to all–his behavior after leaving prison is a perfect example: no sooner had he left the trying conditions of prison than he immediately commended a three-week fast requesting peace between the warring religious factions, an event that captured the imagination of the world and indeed went a long way toward easing tensions between Hindus and Muslims. His "soul-force" may well have been the only thing that could bring all Indians together, and he used it to amazing effect.

Even as Gandhi served to unify the Indian people, his figure served to expose the contradictions within the British position on the subcontinent. For while the members of Gandhi's home-rule movement strengthened their arguments by pointing to the oppression of the British Viceroys, those Viceroys attempting to quell the Gandhi phenomenon in fact failed because of a policy not oppressive enough. Theirs was a liberal empire in the end, and they were raised in a liberal tradition that prized freedom of speech, of the press, and of assembly; thus they could not counter satyagraha and stay true to themselves. Had Gandhi practiced satyagraha in, say, Stalin's Soviet Union or Hitler's Germany–or had the British been willing to violate their own liberal principles and imprison him for life, deport him, or even execute him–the struggle for independence might have taken a dramatically different turn. But then, such a crackdown was never a realistic possibility. Indeed, most of his British antagonists genuinely liked Gandhi, and by the 1920s, weary of war and empire, most of them had reconciled themselves to some sort of home rule for India in the near future. Independence was coming, in one shape or another, despite the resistance of die-hard imperialists in Britain, because the British had lost the will to sustain their empire; and yet the Viceroys, governors and Secretaries of State were still not willing to give India total independence.

8 0
3 years ago
Which part of a book usually states the central idea and previews the smaller ideas book will cover?
DerKrebs [107]

Introduction.

A book's introduction is closely related to the content of the book itself. Usually found in nonfiction work, the introduction may summarize the main argument presented in the rest of the book, define any important terms, or fill in background details.

5 0
2 years ago
Evaluating Evidence:Question 9<br> What is the main difference between news and opinion pieces?
Jet001 [13]

Answer:

I think its b

Explanation:

plz tell me if I'm wrong

5 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • In which sentence is all punctuation correct? A. “Most people” I told him “believe anything they hear on television or see on th
    8·1 answer
  • Which of the following themes can be seen in this selection of the Circuit?
    10·2 answers
  • How does the figurative language in these lines develop a theme of the poem? Shall worms, inheritors of this excess, Eat up thy
    6·1 answer
  • Read the excerpt below. Which of the following statements best summarizes the main idea of the excerpt?Gertrude Belle Elion was
    11·1 answer
  • Sometimes people mix metaphors, especially people who use clichés. Find
    7·1 answer
  • Is it true or false that Emerson states that God will not have his work manifest by cowards?
    11·1 answer
  • Tarshis explains that she wanted her story to give readers a sense of what it was like to live in 1925 (1:10). Did she succeed?
    13·2 answers
  • HELP ME PLEASE! ILL GIVE BRAINLIEST PLEASE !!!!
    8·1 answer
  • Based on the information in paragraph 2, the reader can infer that the first pinball game was made:
    14·1 answer
  • How about _________ to the cinema tonight?
    8·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!