![\bf \cfrac{\sqrt[4]{63}}{4\sqrt[4]{6}}\qquad \begin{cases} 63=3\cdot 3\cdot 7\\ 6=2\cdot 3 \end{cases}\implies \cfrac{\sqrt[4]{3\cdot 3\cdot 7}}{4\sqrt[4]{2\cdot 3}}\implies \cfrac{\underline{\sqrt[4]{3}}\cdot \sqrt[4]{3}\cdot \sqrt[4]{7}}{4\sqrt[4]{2}\cdot \underline{\sqrt[4]{3}}} \\\\\\ \cfrac{\sqrt[4]{3}\cdot \sqrt[4]{7}}{4\sqrt[4]{2}}\implies \cfrac{\sqrt[4]{3\cdot 7}}{4\sqrt[4]{2}}\implies \cfrac{\sqrt[4]{21}}{4\sqrt[4]{2}}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cbf%20%5Ccfrac%7B%5Csqrt%5B4%5D%7B63%7D%7D%7B4%5Csqrt%5B4%5D%7B6%7D%7D%5Cqquad%20%0A%5Cbegin%7Bcases%7D%0A63%3D3%5Ccdot%203%5Ccdot%207%5C%5C%0A6%3D2%5Ccdot%203%0A%5Cend%7Bcases%7D%5Cimplies%20%5Ccfrac%7B%5Csqrt%5B4%5D%7B3%5Ccdot%203%5Ccdot%207%7D%7D%7B4%5Csqrt%5B4%5D%7B2%5Ccdot%203%7D%7D%5Cimplies%20%5Ccfrac%7B%5Cunderline%7B%5Csqrt%5B4%5D%7B3%7D%7D%5Ccdot%20%5Csqrt%5B4%5D%7B3%7D%5Ccdot%20%5Csqrt%5B4%5D%7B7%7D%7D%7B4%5Csqrt%5B4%5D%7B2%7D%5Ccdot%20%5Cunderline%7B%5Csqrt%5B4%5D%7B3%7D%7D%7D%0A%5C%5C%5C%5C%5C%5C%0A%5Ccfrac%7B%5Csqrt%5B4%5D%7B3%7D%5Ccdot%20%5Csqrt%5B4%5D%7B7%7D%7D%7B4%5Csqrt%5B4%5D%7B2%7D%7D%5Cimplies%20%5Ccfrac%7B%5Csqrt%5B4%5D%7B3%5Ccdot%207%7D%7D%7B4%5Csqrt%5B4%5D%7B2%7D%7D%5Cimplies%20%5Ccfrac%7B%5Csqrt%5B4%5D%7B21%7D%7D%7B4%5Csqrt%5B4%5D%7B2%7D%7D)
![\bf \textit{now, rationalizing the denominator}\\\\ \cfrac{\sqrt[4]{21}}{4\sqrt[4]{2}}\cdot \cfrac{\sqrt[4]{2^3}}{\sqrt[4]{2^3}}\implies \cfrac{\sqrt[4]{21}\cdot \sqrt[4]{8}}{4\sqrt[4]{2}\cdot \sqrt[4]{2^3}}\implies \cfrac{\sqrt[4]{21\cdot 8}}{4\sqrt[4]{2\cdot 2^3}}\implies \cfrac{\sqrt[4]{168}}{4\sqrt[4]{2^4}} \\\\\\ \cfrac{\sqrt[4]{168}}{4\cdot 2}\implies \cfrac{\sqrt[4]{168}}{8}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cbf%20%5Ctextit%7Bnow%2C%20rationalizing%20the%20denominator%7D%5C%5C%5C%5C%0A%5Ccfrac%7B%5Csqrt%5B4%5D%7B21%7D%7D%7B4%5Csqrt%5B4%5D%7B2%7D%7D%5Ccdot%20%5Ccfrac%7B%5Csqrt%5B4%5D%7B2%5E3%7D%7D%7B%5Csqrt%5B4%5D%7B2%5E3%7D%7D%5Cimplies%20%5Ccfrac%7B%5Csqrt%5B4%5D%7B21%7D%5Ccdot%20%5Csqrt%5B4%5D%7B8%7D%7D%7B4%5Csqrt%5B4%5D%7B2%7D%5Ccdot%20%5Csqrt%5B4%5D%7B2%5E3%7D%7D%5Cimplies%20%5Ccfrac%7B%5Csqrt%5B4%5D%7B21%5Ccdot%208%7D%7D%7B4%5Csqrt%5B4%5D%7B2%5Ccdot%202%5E3%7D%7D%5Cimplies%20%5Ccfrac%7B%5Csqrt%5B4%5D%7B168%7D%7D%7B4%5Csqrt%5B4%5D%7B2%5E4%7D%7D%0A%5C%5C%5C%5C%5C%5C%0A%5Ccfrac%7B%5Csqrt%5B4%5D%7B168%7D%7D%7B4%5Ccdot%202%7D%5Cimplies%20%5Ccfrac%7B%5Csqrt%5B4%5D%7B168%7D%7D%7B8%7D)
and is all you can simplify from it.
so... all we did, was rationaliize it, namely, "getting rid of the pesky radical at the bottom", we do so by simply multiplying it by something that will raise the radicand, to the same degree as the root, thus the radicand comes out.
Answer:
3√(22) + 7
Step-by-step explanation:
The way this is worded can be interpreted two different ways so just to cover the bases, I'll do both. I'm confident they are asking for way 1 though because it wants you to simplify the expression, not evaluate. Way 2 gives you a solution rather than an exact equation.
<u>Number 1</u>
√(6) x √(33) + 7
= √(6 x 33) + 7
= √(198) + 7
= √(9 x 22) + 7
= 3√(22) + 7
<u>Number 2</u>
√(6) x √(33 + 7)
= √(6) x √(40)
= √(6) x (4√(10))
= 4√(60)
= 8√(15)
The answer is D your welcome
Answer:
0.0001524
Please Mark Brainliest If This Helped!
Answer:
yes
Step-by-step explanation:
You can perform the "line test." If it is a function, there will not be two x's of the same value. In this case, x is 2,6,-1. No number repeats, thus making a function.
