Answer: A) SNCC wanted to use more confrontational strategies.
The SCLC and the SNCC were two civil rights groups in the 1960s. However, they had significant ideological differences. SNCC believed in the importance of grassroots activism, and was mostly formed by students. The SCLC, on the other hand, focused on collaborating with movements already active in an area.
Moreover, SNCC wanted to empower common black people, and focused greatly on political participation and activism. They used methods such as asking for donations and boycotting businesses. They believed that the involvement of SCLC was superficial, and that it lacked fundamental objectives. They also thought their methods were not powerful enough. SNCC lost their emphasis on non violence and adopted confrontational techniques from the principles of Black Power. They also took a separatist approach.
The student protesters would often use nonviolent techniques, similar to the sit ins and marches that were prevalent during the civil rights movements. There is your answer :)
Answer: La vie politique de sir Wilfrid Laurier. Le très honorable sir Wilfrid Laurier, premier ministre du Canada de 1896 à 1911. Sir Wilfrid Laurier a été député au Parlement pendant plus de quarante
Explanation:
Capitalism is my best guess, considering it is one of the few forms of economy that allows mostly free production. Free enterprise could also be the answer.
