1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
dimaraw [331]
3 years ago
9

How does las casas use historical and religious examples to turn the argument against those who would subjugate the indians by f

orce ? How does he make ethics a part of his argument ?
History
1 answer:
dusya [7]3 years ago
8 0

Bartolome de las Casas was a 16th-century priest who arrived as a colonist in the early years of the Spanish conquest of America. He was appointed first Bishop of Chiapas (now Chiapas, Mexico) and referred to as “Protector of the Indians.” He is especially remembered because of his efforts to improve the treatment of the indigenous people in the colonies.  

Question 1:

Las Casas argued against those who believed that Indians were a primitive race, and as such needed to be subjugated by force for their own good. This was the view of scholars like Sepulveda. Las Casas, however, argued that the development of Indian people was parallel to that of many major cultures around the world. He claims that:

  • The Indians selected men of high virtue to be their gods, unlike cultures like the Greeks or Roman, who chose imperfect gods. He argues this implies that the Indians have a better understanding of “godliness” and therefore would not be difficult to convert.
  • They had good laws and customs, such as successful marriages and coronations of rulers.
  • Their industries employed specialized people, with societies being able to cover everybody’s needs.  

Question 2:

Las Casas’ ethical arguments were also powerful. He argued that Indians were children of God, and should be treated as such. He also claimed that they were good at heart; with good feelings and not deceitful. Therefore, they had the right to be taught the doctrine of God as any other good person would.

He also argued that Indians were made by God. Everything they were was intended by God, and he gave them their resources for them to use them as well as they could. They used them in a particular way, but were intelligent enough to be taught better ways.


You might be interested in
For all the good attributed to the Progressive Era, there was one major problem that surfaced. What was it? too little governmen
Mrac [35]

too much government control

A major negative effect of the Progressive era was too much government control which led to political corruption in both the state and national level. Powerful politicians became overpowering to the interest of the public resulting in ineffective government


7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What factors made it especially<br> difficult to farm in the northern<br> plateau of Mesopotamia?
tino4ka555 [31]

Answer:

C. rocky, infertile soil.

Explanation:

although mesopotamia had fertile soil, farming wasn't easy there. the region received little rain. this meant that the water levels in the tigris and euphrates rivers depended on how much rain fell in eastern asia minor where the two rivers began.

8 0
3 years ago
Pleaseee help with this and trust me there’s a lot more on the way to so if you guys wanna help with those ones to it’d be aweso
Juli2301 [7.4K]

Answer: B: A, D, E

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Why was the recreation of Belgium important in the failure of the schlieffen plan<br>​
sergejj [24]

<h2><u>Explanation:</u></h2>

There were a lot of factors -- most were not what Schlieffen expected.

1. France wasn't that easy to conquer. It took longer than Schlieffen thought.

2. Belgium did not respond the way Schlieffen expected. They fought Germany.

3. Russia was more flexible that Schlieffen thought. They mobilized quicker and were much more adept at using their forces.

4. In all, Schlieffen made plans that were inflexible and did not account for the way wars are actually fought.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Mark the statement if it accurately describes Magellan’s expedition.
anzhelika [568]
"<span>a. The expedition was the first to successfully circumnavigate the globe" is the only accurate description of Magellan's expedition, although this is now being slightly disputed. </span>
3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Who was the leader of the constitutional convention
    13·2 answers
  • Why did the united states object to the soviet union controlling poland, czechoslovakia, hungary, romania, and bulgaria as satel
    10·2 answers
  • What was the primary difference between Presidential and Congressional Reconstruction plans?
    15·1 answer
  • WW2 started in?<br> And who started it ?
    13·2 answers
  • What was the great migration during world war 1
    5·2 answers
  • For fifteen years during the 1960s and 1970s India, the world’s largest democracy, was run by a woman. Who was this four-term Pr
    8·1 answer
  • Why was the Roman destruction of the second temple so devastating to the Jews?
    14·1 answer
  • Which country did BiH belong to in the first half of the 19th century?​
    6·1 answer
  • Help me plssssssssss<br> just fill up the blank
    12·2 answers
  • The three- dimensional attack on poverty adopted by the government has not succeeded in poverty alleviation in india. Comment on
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!