1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
yanalaym [24]
3 years ago
11

In the process of a bill becoming a law when is a bill given a title and a number?

History
1 answer:
Sindrei [870]3 years ago
6 0

The Bill is given a title and a number after the first reading.

You might be interested in
Which event caused an American declaration of war against Spain?
Rainbow [258]

Answer:

On April 25, 1898 the United States declared war on Spain following the sinking of the Battleship Maine in Havana harbor on February 15, 1898. The war ended with the signing of the Treaty of Paris on December 10, 1898.

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
1. Which of the following ideas were put forth by Thomas Jefferson?
olganol [36]

An agricultural economy(farming)

8 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
It could be said that “History is what the present chooses to remember about
Masja [62]

Since we don't know which movie is being referred to, let's talk generally about the relationship between history and cinema.

The present influences every historical production. There is an influence of the present on historiographical works -- that is, history produced by and for historians, academics -- as there is on movies, fiction books, tv series, etc.

However, historians are aware of this since the first moment of their studies, so they are trained to seek detachment from the present in order to avoid a biased view of the past. But the present is always a strong force and neutrality is impossible. Thus the most plausible way to follow on historical research is to make clear how the present shows in the work, how it guided questions, and turn it into a tool to understand the past.

When we talk about a movie this is different. A historical movie is a different kind of medium -- it's not a paper published after other historians' approval -- and has a different kind of audience than historical research. So it doesn't have the same space to make it explicitly clear how the present influences it; it can not put a footnote when it's portraying historical events and figures so the viewer can check things on his/her own. When we watch a movie we don't have access to sources utilized and on which historiographical line the movie production based its story.

Following from this, basically, you have three possible conclusions:

1) Movies don't improve the viewer's understanding because it is difficult to check if the movie production utilized reliable sources and bibliography. It could portray historical events with absurd analysis, make whopping anachronisms, which doesn't lead to a qualified understanding of history.

2) Movies improve the viewer's understanding of history because, despite analytical errors and anachronisms, it contributes to spread knowledge about the past that can be later improved through qualified studying by the viewer. It can be said movies have an important role in disseminating a historical culture that can be healthy for societies.

3) Movies can improve as much as they can damage serious historical knowledge and the understanding of history. If they are based on qualified historiography they can be important diffusers of a healthy historical culture that helps society to think and rethink its past, present, and future. However, if they spread poor historical knowledge, they can make it hard for good quality history to gain headway.

3 0
3 years ago
Explain ONE specific way in which imperialism affected the development of the domestic economies of imperial states.
inysia [295]

Answer: The exploitation of natural and mineral resources.

Explanation:

It is common knowledge that the imperialist powers exploited the conquered lands to the extreme. Everything that could make a profit was used. The hair folks who worked those hard jobs were forced to work for free or for food. So the colonial powers had cheap labor, and they got the raw materials for free. In this way, they could satisfy the domestic market and sell the surplus and gain enormous financial benefits.

3 0
3 years ago
What was an outcome of the Compromise of 1877?
avanturin [10]

An outcome of the compromise of 1877 was that Southern leaders publicly gave support to Hayes because his policies helped their economies.

<h3>What did the compromise of 1877 do?</h3>

The compromise of the year 1877 helped to pull the federal troops out of the Southern part of the nation.

The Republican Hayes was awarded the white house based on the understanding that the federal troops would be pulled out of the South.

Read more on the compromise of 1877 here:

brainly.com/question/16584474

#SPJ1

7 0
1 year ago
Other questions:
  • Why do you think that for centuries most people thought the Trojan war was just a legend
    14·2 answers
  • What type of party is the progressive party? how do you know?
    11·1 answer
  • The Renaissance began in Italy spurring out of a movement known as Humanism. True False
    10·2 answers
  • Which of the following did the five reformers who organized the Seneca Falls Convention have in common? 1 They came from states
    14·2 answers
  • Which statement best illustrates ideals that reflects socialism?
    8·2 answers
  • Can someone help me for the question please?
    12·1 answer
  • The most important reason for assyria’s military successes was its
    7·1 answer
  • Which statement would most likely be a belief shared by both Martin lurther and John Calvin
    9·1 answer
  • Amusement parks were a portion of the spread in mass culture. True or False
    8·1 answer
  • Can someone plz help me? :(
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!