Answer: explaining below
Explanation:
Okay so basically Hamilton and Jefferson really had opposing views on how they saw the future of America ... hamilton would bring forth an idea and Jefferson would be like yeah no <3 that's unconstitutional... but Washington typically leaned more with hamilton just because thats generally more where he gravitated towards in terms of being biased if that makes sense. Hope this helps explain that a bit.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Without a doubt, the effects of the act on Native American history over the course of the twentieth century left the Native Indians divided, hurt, and without their lands.
The Dawes General Allotment Act of 1887 was one of the major pieces of legislation in Native American history. The Act granted the power to the federal government of the United States to split the land and divide it into individual plots so people could get the land and make it work. If a Native American Indian wanted to be considered a United States citizen, it had to accept the Act.
This piece of legislation was another try to change the Indian's culture and habits, to destroy their traditions, and getting them to assume the white American culture.
This was another episode of the complicated and conflictive relationships between white colonists and Native American tribes, that started the moment colonists arrived in the Americas and founded colonies.
White people always wanted more land to settle in and exploit the resources for a big profit.
Native Indians always believed that the land belonged to them and had been inherited by their ancestors.
Answer:
The French colonized Vietnam in the mid 1800s, The decision to invade Vietnam was made by Napoleon III in July 1857. It was the result not only of missionary propaganda but also, after 1850, of the upsurge of French capitalism, which generated the need for overseas markets and the desire for a larger French share of the Asian territories conquered by the West.
Explanation:
Answer:there was less chance of being attacked and robbed. it was slower. the ships could carry more than carts or pack animal trains. sailors were cheaper to employ.
Explanation:
