Answer:yes
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
See Below
Step-by-step explanation:
<u>Statements:</u> <u>Reasons:</u>
<u />
Given
Definition of Equilateral
Given
Definition of Midpoint
Segment Addition
Substitution
Definition of Midpoint
Segment Addition
Substitution
Substitution
Division Property of Equality
Transitive Property
Definition of Midpoint
Segment Addition
Substitution
Substitution
Substitution
Transitive Property
Definition of Equilateral
SAS Congruence
CPCTC
Equilateral Triangle Theorem
Answer would be B. Sorry if my handwriting is messy or if I didn’t explain enough
One nice thing about this situation is that you’ve been given everything in the same base. To review a little on the laws of exponents, when you have two exponents with the same base being:
– Multiplied: Add their exponents
– Divided: Subtract their exponents
We can see that in both the numerator and denominator we have exponents *multiplied* together, and the product in the numerator is being *divided* by the product in the detonator, so that translates to *summing the exponents on the top and bottom and then finding their difference*. Let’s throw away the twos for a moment and just focus on the exponents. We have
[11/2 + (-7) + (-5)] - [3 + 1/2 + (-10)]
For convenience’s sake, I’m going to turn 11/2 into the mixed number 5 1/2. Summing the terms in the first brackets gives us
5 1/2 + (-7) + (-5) = - 1 1/2 + (-5) = -6 1/2
And summing the terms in the second:
3 + 1/2 + (-10) = 3 1/2 + (-10) = -6 1/2
Putting those both into our first question gives us -6 1/2 - (-6 1/2), which is 0, since any number minus itself gives us 0.
Now we can bring the 2 back into the mix. The 0 we found is the exponent the 2 is being raised to, so our answer is
2^0, which is just 1.