The main reason why cost of product is little in one country and more in another is because of
- profiteering measures taken by exporting companies.
- higher costs of exporting.
Cost of exportation of goods, taxes, original product cost, Profit measures are all part of reasons why exported goods are more higher in cost when compared to the cost in producing country.
The company who imported the product will ensure its makes profiton the sales and also, the cost of moving the product into the country are usually high, therefore, they all contributed to the high cost
Therefore, the Option A and E is correct because profiteering measures taken by exporting companies and higher costs of exporting contributes to the higher cost of exported products
Read more here
<em>brainly.com/question/12906042</em>
The Tullen Group is an example of a marketing intermediary as it is hired to design an advertising campaign that includes creating a web presence.
<h3>What is a
marketing intermediary?</h3>
This refers to those independent firms that assist firms in the flow of goods and services from producers to end-users.
A typical example of a marketing intermediary includes:
- the agents
- the wholesalers
- the retailers.
Also, these intermediary also functions as a link between manufacturers and customers in the distribution of products.
Hence, the Tullen Group is an example of a marketing intermediary as it is hired to design an advertising campaign that includes creating a web presence.
Read more about marketing intermediary
brainly.com/question/25689913
#SPJ1
Explanation:
A focus group can be defined as a qualitative marketing research method where some people with common characteristics are brought together in a group who are guided by a trainer to promote discussions on a particular topic of interest and gather information to assist in decision making.
To organize focus groups for an innovative German-style fast food restaurant, you could separate 3 groups, the first being ages 18 to 30, the second 30-45 and the third group 45 and above.
The screening criteria could be, sources of income, profession, sex, taste for food, hobbies, etc.
The questions to ask could be related to the number of times a week people eat fast food, what is your favorite German food, how much are you willing to pay for the options offered in the restaurant, what elements do you consider most attractive in a restaurant ,etc.
Answer:
Because the government can use her sovereign power to both mitigate negative externalities as well as encourage positive externalities.
Explanation:
A positive externality occurs when the transaction between a producer and end user benefits a third party that did not take art in the process.
A very Good example is Education. There is a third party benefit to the society when we have more educated citizens.
A negative externality happens when the business transaction between a manufacturer and consumer affects a third party adversely. a typical example is cigarettes. When cigarettes is consumed by the end user, the smoke can affect the health of a third party that was not part of the initial transaction.
To deal with both positive and negative externalities, government intervention is very crucial.
Government encourages positive externalities like education by subsidizing the cost of attending a school. They also enact laws that make basic education compulsory.
In the case of negative externalities, Government can intervene with a ban on producing harmful goods and also set a legislation about smoking in public laces to mitigate the health complications caused by third party inhalation.
Answer:
Henry is analyzing - "Would it be ethical not to take action?"
Explanation:
Ethics is a moral principle that involves a concept to become right or wrong. Business ethics and work ethics are beyond what ordinary ethics describes. Business ethics works with appropriate business policies and practices which encourage potential controversy. In this question, Henry worries about the manufacturing process, which emits enormous carbon-dioxide. He wants to upgrade the machine to reduce the emission as well as become echo-friendly. Therefore, he is in between an ethical decision whether to take action or not to take action. So, he is analyzing, "Whether it be ethical not to take action?"
