All categories

2 years ago

How do the achievements of Mohandas Gandhi compare with those of Nelson Mandela?

History

2 answers:

True [87]2 years ago

8 0

Answer:

well here are nelson Mandela's accomplishments

#1 HE BECAME THE NATIONAL PRESIDENT OF THE ANC YOUTH LEAGUE IN 1950

#2 MANDELA WAS A LEADING OPPONENT OF THE 1948 APARTHEID LEGISLATION

#3 HE CO-FOUNDED THE FIRST BLACK LEGAL PARTNERSHIP IN SOUTH AFRICA

#4 HIS SPEECH DURING RIVONIA TRIAL IS CONSIDERED ONE OF THE GREAT SPEECHES OF THE 20TH CENTURY

#5 NELSON MANDELA PLAYED THE LEADING ROLE IN ENDING APARTHEID

#6 NELSON MANDELA WAS THE FIRST BLACK PRESIDENT OF SOUTH AFRICA

#7 HE FOCUSED ON NATIONAL RECONCILIATION DURING HIS PRESIDENCY

#8 HE SERVED AS THE SECRETARY-GENERAL OF THE NON-ALIGNED MOVEMENT FROM 1998 TO 1999

#9 HE FOUNDED A NUMBER OF ORGANISATIONS TO PROMOTE EQUALITY AND FIGHT PROBLEMS LIKE AIDS

#10 NELSON MANDELA WAS AWARDED THE 1993 NOBEL PEACE PRIZE

whereas here are Gandhi's accomplishments:

#1 HE FOUGHT AGAINST RACIAL DISCRIMINATION IN SOUTH AFRICA

#2 HIS SATYAGRAHA CAMPAIGN IN SA LED TO THE 1914 INDIAN RELIEF ACT

#3 MAHATMA GANDHI WON HIS FIRST BATTLE OF CIVIL DISOBEDIENCE IN INDIA AT CHAMPARAN

#4 HE SUCCESSFULLY LED A NON-VIOLENT TAX REVOLT IN KHEDA

#5 HE LED THE POPULAR NON-COOPERATION MOVEMENT IN EARLY 1920S

#6 MAHATMA GANDHI LED THE FAMOUS SALT MARCH TO DANDI

#7 HE LAUNCHED THE QUIT INDIA MOVEMENT IN 1942 DEMANDING END OF BRITISH RULE

#8 MAHATMA GANDHI WAS THE LEADING FIGURE RESPONSIBLE FOR INDIA ACHIEVING INDEPENDENCE

#9 HE FOUGHT AGAINST SOCIAL EVILS IN SOCIETY LIKE UNTOUCHABILITY

#10 GANDHI WAS RUNNER UP TO EINSTEIN IN TIME’S PERSON OF THE CENTURY

so i think that they both achieve loads of great achievements because they made a change in the world well that's my opinion

Explanation:

While both protested oppression through peaceful resistance, Mandela eventually accepted armed resistance.

Both wanted political freedom for their respective countries. Gandhi used peaceful non-cooperation. Mandela murdered people.

so i think that

Lerok [7]2 years ago

8 0

Answer:

<h2>There are several achievements that can be compared:</h2>

Both of them mobilised masses of people.
They protested peacefully.
They were jailed for their cause.
They achieve the presidency of each country.
Somehow, both personalities fought for emancipation.
Most important, both completed their mission.

You might be interested in

Is imperial rule always a negative experience? Are there positive things about empires? The Roman Empire, for example, brought l

tester [92]

Here we go..
These questions deal with opinion and perspective supplied by facts, so if this is purely academic there is no perfect answer. In my opinion, yes imperial rule has always been bad. There are positive things about empires, that is what makes them interesting. There are pros and cons, but often that not (speaking in both modern and recent times) the pros are supposed to blot out the cons. The Roman Empire is an ancient example, so yeah those pros weren't mean to blot out the cons. Never forget this, most pros of the imperial government are to make 'managing' easier. If the people dont want to be ruled by a foreign power, then youll get what you always have. Riots and whatnot. Ha, flip open any area of a text book and youll find the answer to "What is a lot or half the people dont want the imperialism?" Listen, there is no such thing as a completely good anything. But also, never let that be an excuse for injustice. Whether or not you judge yours or someone elses empire as good depends on you really, how you feel what you want, your morals. And if you want specific examples - I have plenty. But I am tired of typing now so if you want examples just msg me. Hope I helped

6 0

3 years ago

What is a major difference between hard money and soft money donations to<br> political campaigns?

son4ous [18]

Answer:

Soft money (sometimes called non-federal money) means contributions made outside the limits and prohibitions of federal law. ... On the other hand, hard money means the contributions that are subject to FECA; that is, limited individual and PAC contributions only.

8 0

2 years ago

Which best describes the Bush Doctrine of Preemption? A. a foreign policy stance that ascribes to multilateral engagement for th

dalvyx [7]

D. a foreign policy stance that espouses a unilateral approach to protecting the best interests of the United States.

This sort of policy agenda was part of the "neoconservative" view of a number of President George W. Bush's advisers -- especially some who had also served in the administration of his father, President George H.W. Bush. In the wake of the 9/11 attacks, there was a desire to push American values and not be shy about doing so with the use of American military might. Sometimes referred to as the "Bush Doctrine," the core ideas were that the United States could pursue this goals on its own (without need for United Nations partnerships), that preemptive strikes were allowable against countries that harbored terrorists, and that regime change for the sake of promoting democracy was a good strategy.

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Who fought as allies with the Americans, contributing to the victory at Yorktown? General Washington Second Continental Congress

lora16 [44]

French armed forces.

3 0

3 years ago

What was the lasting impact of the Bucktail Republican Party in New York?

Alborosie

Answer:

They elevated Martin Van Buren to the national political stage.

Explanation:

The Bucktails were led by him and was a faction of the Democratic-Republican Party in New York opposed to the governor DeWitt Clinton.

Martin Van Buren as leader of the bucktails established a political machine known as the Albany Regency and emerged as the most influential political figure of the state. Finally, he served as the eighth president of the United States from 1837 to 1841. The first president born after the independence from the British.

I hope this answer helps you.

8 0

3 years ago

How do the achievements of Mohandas Gandhi compare with those of Nelson Mandela?​

How do the achievements of Mohandas Gandhi compare with those of Nelson Mandela?