If a building has 18,000 square feet of useable space and 2,000 square feet of common area, the rentable/useable factor would be 1.111 The amount of a commercial property that the tenant can actually use is measured in "usable square feet," or USF.
The common parts of the buildings, such as the foyers, corridors, stairwells, and public restrooms, are excluded. The USF, however, comprises everything that is enclosed inside the borders of the floor, excluding elevators and staircases, in the instance of tenants who have leased the full level for commercial uses.
The USF of the tenant for a partial floor lease encompasses everything that is particular to their portion of the property. USF is regarded as a significant component since it aids in determining the precise space that the tenant has available for business needs.
To learn more about usable square, click here
brainly.com/question/15700485
#SPJ4
Answer:
GDP equals $1455, answer is D
Explanation:
GDP = Consumption + Investment + Net exports + Private saving - National saving + Taxes
GDP = 1000 + 200 - 50 + 225 - 150 + 230
GDP = 1,455
Answer:
If I was banking with my local town bank and it happens that Bank of Africa purchases it, there are cost and benefits associated with the merge. First, Bank of America is global, meaning that I will be able to access the Services such as ATM services at different points. Second, due to its area of coverage, the services are cheaper compared to the ones I got when it was in my local town. However, due to the monopoly of the bank, they might increase the charges making them more expensive than when the services in the local village. Additionally, it will be a challenge for average customers, such as farmers, to access big banks unless faithful people accompany them.
Explanation:
Answer:
a) Qs = 50 + 20p - 7ps
= 50 + 20p - 7×(2)
= 50 + 20p - 14
= 36 + 20p
At equilibrium, 
= 
So, 150 - 10p + 5
= 36 + 20p
So, 20p + 10p = 30p
= 150 - 36 + 5
= 114 + 5
So, p = (114/30) + (5/30)
= 3.8 + 0.17
Thus, 
= 3.8 + 0.17
Q = 36 + 20p
= 36 + 20(3.8 + 0.17)
= 36 + 76 + 3.4
= 112 + 3.4
Thus, 
= 112 + 3.4
b) = 3.8 + 0.17
= 3.8 + 0.17×(5)
= 3.8 + .85
= 4.65
= 112 + 3.4
= 112 + 3.4(5)
= 112 + 17
= 129
c) Qd = 150 - 10p + 5pb = 150 - 10(2.5) + 5(5) = 150 - 25 + 25 = 150
Qs = 36 + 20p = 36 + 20(2.5) = 36 + 50 = 86
Thus, there is excess demand as >
d) New = 180 - 10p + 5
= 180 - 10p + 5×(5)
= 180 - 10p + 25
= 205 - 10p
Now, new = gives,
205 - 10p = 36 + 20p
So, 20p + 10p = 205 - 36
So, 30p = 169
So, p = 169÷30
So, = 5.63
Q = 205 - 10p = 205 - 10×(5.63) = 205 - 56.3 = 148.7
So, = 148.7
Answer:
Late Majority.
Explanation:
The adoption of a product by consumers is divided into five categories, namely, <u>innovators, early adopters, early majority, late majority, and laggards</u>. Such customers are known as adopters who adopt to new technology differently. The category of adopters was proposed by Everett Rogers in 1962.
In the given scenario, Emy exemplifies Late majority adopter.
Late Majority adopters are those adopters who adopts new innovation or technology after observing that the product has been adopted fruitfully by the majority of society. They rank on the second last position of the adopters. They are more skeptical to the product before adopting it. So, Emy fits the late majority category of adopters as she is skeptical about the fancy device shown by her friend.
