Answer:
Explanation:
The formula for GDP is
GDP = C + I + G + NX
C = consumption
I = Investment by business and household purchases by individuals
G = Government Expenditures
NX = foreign trade.
The first thing you can do is knock out foreign trade.
I think you can dispense with Government expenditures as well all though a school is an arm of government.
I think investment is what you have to look at carefully because it does include charitable organizations. We'll come back to this.
Consumption is what it sounds like it sounds.
You can't answer this in any other way than to know how the company writes it off. It is an asset that goes from some value to 0. It no longer exists on their books. So it decreases their assets. It is balanced on their books by calling it an expense I think and that further has impact on their books.
So they are decreasing their value (albeit by a small amount -- they've already bought new computers).
I'm not sure about this, but I think what has happened is that the GDP is going to go down. Their investment has decreased by being written off.
The correct answer is B.) The problem of scarcity does not exist.
Because since it is a 'perfectly competitive' market then scarcity shouldnt exist.
-Autumn Leaves
Answer:
<u>A) private-sector entrepreneurs can expropriate the profits generated by the efforts of private and public entities.</u>
Explanation:
- As there exist four basic structures of the market economy in the form of perfect competition, imperfect competition, oligopoly, and monopoly.
- Thus without any legal system of trade in the market economy, the profits that are generated by the public and private sectors can be taken away by these entities as a large number of small firms tends to compete in the market against each other with there homogenous products.
- Thus under such circumstances, the market economy would deprive all the profits made by the other forms in the market and put barriers to entry for others. Buyers thus will be deprived of the quality products.
Answer:
Could you add more details please
Explanation:
Answer:
C) III
- III. No, the policy was excluded from Joseph's estate.
Explanation:
It doesn't matter who pays the policy's premiums, what matters is who is the beneficiary of the policy. If the proceeds of the policy are paid to the insured's estate, then they are part of it, but if the proceeds are paid to another beneficiary, then they are not included in the estate.
Since Joseph's wife was the owner and beneficiary of the policy, the proceeds will be paid directly to her. The advantage here is that proceeds from the life insurance policy are not taxed as income, but if Joseph's state was larger than $5.43 million, then estate taxes might apply.
