By inference, the way in which Zaroff is portrayed as Rainsford’s foil is that: "Zaroff is a person without a conscience, but Rainsford has one." (Option B)
<h3>What is the explanation for the above inference?</h3>
As evidenced by the excerpt, Zaroff is not opposed to murdering others, which he regards as a form of hunting.
He has no regard for human life and is unconcerned whether they live or die, which distinguishes his character from Rainsford's.
Learn more about inference at;
brainly.com/question/25913650
#SPJ1
Why do you think space exploration is important? And… What do you think the world will be like in 100 years?
These questions can have many answers that many can discuss together and find out so much information from
Answer : The suits help swimmers; however, they do not make up for hard training .
Hope it helps you:)
This creates a desperate tone because he is talking about someone that he loved and is sad
Answer:
B. participles
Explanation:
Participles are words created from verbs, that are used as an adjective. For example, the word winning is a verb. But in this sentence, "The winning competitor wins the trophy." the word winning is used to describe someone and not necessarily just the action they have participated in.
