Answer:
$1.68
Step-by-step explanation:
Remember that cents are in the hundredths place. So think of it as rounding to the nearest hundredth place. 1.6845 ---> 1.68
The given example is inductive reasoning.
<h3>What is inductive reasoning?</h3>
The method of arriving at a conclusion based on a series of observations is known as inductive reasoning. It is not a valid method of proof in and of itself.
We have the information that. Janelle got invited to a shopping spree with a friend and is supposed to meet her at the mall at 4:00 p.m. when she has gone to the mall in the past,
she has noticed that it takes about two hours for her to travel to the mall. she has also noticed that it takes her 30 minutes to get ready before leaving her apartment. she concludes that she needs to start getting ready at 0:30 p.m.
The given information is giving us the series of the data like we are having a sequence of the timing at what time what she did so we have a series of observations here.
Therefore the given example is inductive reasoning.
To know more about inductive reasoning follow
brainly.com/question/860494
#SPJ1
Answer:
y=-x+5+-x-5
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
-14p^3+10p^2+4p = 2p (-7p^2+5p+2)
Step-by-step explanation:
-14p^3+10p^2+4p
14=2*7
10=2*5
4=2*2
-14p^3+10p^2+4p = -2*7p^3+2*5p^2+2*2p
The gratest common factor is 2p:
-14p^3+10p^2+4p = 2p [-2*7p^3/(2p)+2*5p^2/(2p)+2*2p/(2p)]
-14p^3+10p^2+4p = 2p [-7p^(3-1)+5p^(2-1)+2]
-14p^3+10p^2+4p = 2p (-7p^2+5p^1+2)
-14p^3+10p^2+4p = 2p (-7p^2+5p+2)
You can't prove that generalization is likely correct. <em />It is told that generalization is never correct and some has told that generalization is sometimes correct, so I guess that would depend on your thoughts, opinions.
hope this helped!!
~Melany~ ;)
