Answer:
d. premium pricing.
Explanation:
Premium pricing is the strategy of pricing in which the product is highly priced in comparison to that of the other similar products available in the market. This is done in order to keep the belief in customers that the product is superior than those available in the market.
Some people those who think that expensive products are always nice, prefer these kind of products.
Here in the given instance also Sherry prefers this model and her ideology also matches with this technique.
Your answer is going to be true.
Answer:
Dynamic Pricing
Explanation:
Dynamic pricing is the price set to reflect the changes in environment factors and factors that are included in the company's corporate policies. In the above scenario, the company has set a different price in different scenario. The normal customer who visits the store fewer times are not given any discounts however the permanent customer is given discount. This is because of the changes in customer loyalty factor. The company is charging different in different scenarios which means it is pursuing Dynamic Pricing strategy.
Answer:
Niche Marketing
Explanation:
According to my research on different marketing strategies, I can say that based on the information provided within the question Digital's strategy is known as Niche Marketing. Like mentioned in the question this strategy emphasized focusing on small audiences in a very specific category. Which is what Digital is doing by focusing on the smaller market segments that the bigger competition is completely ignoring.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
Answer:
Three part test.
The outcome: if the three requirements are not met, then there is not point the Government should interfere.
At the end, the law will be held.
Explanation:
In some cases, the courts are allowed to protect individual, company or business organization from Government interrupting with these individuals or business organization "fundamental right" and this is the "substantive due process rights " of insurance companies as mentioned in the question above.
The test that the United State Supreme Court can use to determine whether the regulations they want to enact would violate the substantive due process rights of insurance companies is what is known as the THREE PARR TEST.
THE THREE PART TEST has its root from cases such as that of Pasgraf V Long Island Railroad co. The three part test involves three main subjects and they are;
=> foreseeability: are the policies in which insurance companies work going to affect the consumers in the future?
=> proximity: what kind of relationship do the insurance companies have with there consumers?
=> fairness: are these policies just and fair?
CONCLUSION: if the three requirements are not met, then there is not point the Government should interfere.