Answer:
Because I just like that.
Explanation:
I bring the positivity and laughs to the world you know im sayin.
Answer:
In the understanding of this court case, where the plaintiff (L.M.) filed a lawsuit against Pacheco on sexual abuse, the court ruled that the perpetration of the abhorrent act committed did not have to do with Pacheco´s ´´scope of employment´´ as the act happened outside the boundaries of the church and not within his working hours. However, if the plaintiff were to argue that in fact this conduct happened within the scope of employment, she would have to explain and convince that Pacheco was indeed responsible as it is a Pastor's duty and responsibility to guide and counsel at all hours, and not just limited to his church´s hours. A pastor is a figure of responsibility as a visible head for a community, not to mention that in some churches, a pastor is also a legal representative.
Employers should be held liable for the acts of their employees whenever there is a failure to supervise employees or some kind of misdemeanor is perpetrated within the employer´s work facilities or influential premises. These points of view however, are not stated by a lawyer/judicially, these are my personal observations after having researched on the case.
Answer:
Production-oriented style.
Explanation:
According to the Michigan studies on leadership, a work environment characterized by constant influence attempts on the part of the leader through closer supervision or written rules and regulations is likely the result of a production-oriented style of leadership.
Production-oriented style of leadership focuses on increased productivity, workload and sales volume. A production-oriented leader is keep on monitoring his or her employees output to make sure of maximum productivity, this is achieved through closer supervision of employees and written rules and regulations.
At least 100 feet before turning.
Please consider giving brainliest answer and a thanks to the answers you find most helpful. :)
