Answer:
a. The Equal Protection Clause is a clause from the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. The clause provides that "nor shall any State [...] deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws".
Its purpose is to apply substantially more constitutional restrictions against the states than had applied before the Civil War. Hence, in Shaw v. Reno, 509 U.S. 630 (1993), Supreme Court held that redistricting based on race must be held to a standard of strict scrutiny under the equal protection clause while bodies doing redistricting must be conscious of race to the extent that they must ensure compliance with the Voting Rights Act.
While in the case of Easley v. Cromartie, 532 U.S. 234 (2001), Supreme Court held that the State violated the Equal Protection Clause in drawing the 1997 boundaries was based on clearly erroneous findings.
b. In the case of Easley v. Cromartie, an appeal from the decision given in hunt v. Cromartie was filed in the supreme court of the United States by Easley. In hunt v. Cromartie, the court held that the legislature of North Carolina did not use the factor of race while drawing the boundaries in the twelfth congressional district,1992. It was held by the court that the legislature did not violate the equal protection clause of the constitution and no evidence to prove that legislature set its boundaries on a racial basis rather than a political basis.
In Easley v Cromartie the appeal was that drawing the boundaries for voting violated the equal protection clause of the constitution. The supreme court of the United States held that the decision of the district court is erroneous because it actually relied upon racial factors and this is not in the interest of the state.
In Shaw v. Reno the court concluded that the plan of North Carolina tried to segregate the voters on the basis of race.
There really arent correct qualities of a poet. Each poet will have different qualities.
It was called as Beth Din. In general Jewish laws and teachings discourage one Jew from suing another in a civil court. That's why rabbinical courts were made for that very purpose. The Jewish court has an orthodox method used by Jews whenever they have civil disputes.
I believe the answer would be, "Posture".
Answer: The correct answer is : Friendly and parasympathetic. Somatic motor response
Explanation: Hypothalamic neurons, especially within the lateral hypothalamus, respond to sensory signals by inciting an appropriate somatic motor behavioral response. These motor responses influence the somatic motor system, producing motivated behavior. The integration of the sympathetic and the parasympathetic to the emotional expression is mediated by the hypolatam.
