1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
olga2289 [7]
2 years ago
13

How did the cold war led to conflict

History
2 answers:
Bogdan [553]2 years ago
6 0
 the Cold War is a conflict between the Communist nations led by the Soviet Union and the democratic nations led by the United States. The Cold War was a state of geopolitical tension after World War II between powers in the Eastern Bloc the Soviet Union and its satellite states and powers in the Western Block the United States  its nato allies and others. Historians do not fully agree on the dates, but a common timeframe is the period between 1947  the year the Truman Doctrine a US foreign policy pledging to aid nations threatened by Soviet expansionism was announced and 1991 the year the Soviet Union fell.
UkoKoshka [18]2 years ago
5 0

The Cold War led to conflict because the world's two chief powers did not trust each other and were committed to opposing the other side's way of life. Some of the deeper issues that set the USA and the USSR at odds were that the USA was committed to capitalism and democratic institutions of government, whereas the USSR was committed to communism and imposed authoritarian government.  The Cold War was mostly a tension between these worldviews.There were also immediate conflicts and pressure points as the Cold War began. One of those issues was that the USA had atomic weapons and the USSR did not.  (The US would not share that technology with the Soviets, who had been their ally in World War II.)  When the Soviets developed their own atomic weaponry, this led to a massive arms race between the superpowers.

During the course of the Cold War, the two superpowers never directly went to war with one another.  However, they did support a number of proxy wars where they were supporting opposing sides in other conflicts -- such as the Korean War, the Six Day War (in the Middle East), the Soviet-Afghan War, etc.

You might be interested in
19oo momus map.how is this map different from the typical map of the Us?what do the names on the map have in common?
musickatia [10]

The difference between the map during the early 1900´s was the way the early settlements where shown in Irish names, portraying the fact that the Irish population was second, right under the English. Pushed out of Ireland because of  religious conflict back home, decided to come to America, after they were promised land and religious freedom in return for applying their knowledge.

That is when the fear of immigrants taking over started, since English population was not that bigger than the Irish.

7 0
3 years ago
How did candidates Hubert Humphrey and Richard Nixon differ on the central issue of the war in Vietnam in 1968? a. Humphrey supp
vesna_86 [32]

Answer:

d. They differed little on the central issue of Vietnam.

Explanation:

One of the most important topics during the 1968 campaign was the subject of the war in Vietnam. By 1968, the country had grown tired of the war and was seeking a way out. Humphrey was considered to be close to the war and connected to the "old politics" that allowed it to happen. However, there was little evidence to substantiate this. During the campaign, Humphrey emphasized his desire to end the war. In the end, Humphrey and Nixon differed little on the central issue of Vietnam.

5 0
3 years ago
In the space below, write a 500-word comparative essay evaluating the key similarities and differences between the world’s major
vodomira [7]

Form of government, political form, regime of government, political regime, system of government, political system, system of government, model of government or political model are some of the diverse ways of naming an essential concept of political science and the theory of State or constitutional right. It refers to the model of organization of constitutional power adopted by a State in terms of the relationship between the different powers. The way in which political power is structured to exercise its authority in the State, coordinating all the institutions that form it, makes each form of government requires regulatory mechanisms that are characteristic of it.

There are very different nomenclatures to denominate the different forms of government, from the theorists of Antiquity to the Contemporary Age; At present, three types of classifications are usually used:

• The elective character or not of the head of state defines a classification, between republics (elective) and monarchies (non-elective).

• The degree of freedom, pluralism and political participation defines another classification, between democratic, authoritarian and totalitarian systems, depending on whether they allow the exercise of discrepancy and political opposition to a greater or lesser degree or deny more or less radically the possibility of dissidence (establishing a single-party regime, or different types of exceptional regimes, such as dictatorships or military juntas); At the same time, the electoral system through which the popular will expresses itself in participatory systems has had very different historical configurations (direct democracy or assembly, indirect or representative democracy, census or restricted suffrage, universal male suffrage or of both sexes, different determinations of the age of majority, racial segregation, inclusion or not of immigrants, and others), as well as very different ways of altering or distorting it (borgo rotido, gerrymandering, electoral fraud, pucherazo).

• The existing relationship between the head of the State, the government and the parliament defines another classification, between presidentialisms and parliamentarisms (with many degrees or mixed forms between one and the other).

These three classifications are not exclusive, but complement each other, so that a republic can be democratic (United States or South Africa) or non-democratic (China or North Korea); a republican democracy can be parliamentary (Germany or India), semi-presidential (France or Russia) or presidential (Argentina or South Korea); and a monarchy can be democratic and parliamentary (Spain, United Kingdom or Japan), undemocratic (Saudi Arabia or Vatican City) or be placed in intermediate positions (Morocco), very usually qualified in a more or less anachronistic way with terms of the historical forms of the monarchy (feudal monarchy, authoritarian monarchy, absolute monarchy).

8 0
3 years ago
President Harry S. Truman was correct to view the Japanese military led by Hideki Tojo through a lens of _______________.
myrzilka [38]
I would go with realism bc the definition of it is: the attitude or practice of accepting a situation as it is and being prepared to deal with it accordingly.

I hope this helps you :) also, if you could choose two answers I would go with intellectualism too
3 0
2 years ago
Which Is not necessary in a historical essay?
Rzqust [24]

Explanation:

B. first-hand accounts

hope it helps!

5 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • The term empire is best defined as
    7·2 answers
  • Which of the following was the only African state that increased in size and power in the 1800s? User: Which of the following wa
    10·2 answers
  • Which of the following best describes a central idea of the text ?
    8·1 answer
  • What cause the civil war
    6·1 answer
  • Which two islands did the portuguse have their sugar plantions
    12·1 answer
  • Delegates to the constitutional
    10·1 answer
  • Where did Britain want control over and why
    14·2 answers
  • Which development best illustrates why world was 1 is classified as a foal war
    10·1 answer
  • A line of rulers that passes power from father to son is a
    13·2 answers
  • 25 POINTS What important event occurred in 1718?
    13·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!