One of the main differences of interpretation between Charles Beard and Carol Berkin is their point of view on the Constitution and the founding fathers.
Charles Beard is the author of An Economic Interpretation of the Constitution of the United States. In this work published in 1913, the author argued that the Constitution of the United States was formulated to serve the interests of wealthy members of the upper class of society.
One of his most controversial statements is his claim about the Founding Fathers, whom he points out as belonging to the upper-class group and who wrote the Constitution to defend their rights and interests.
On the other hand, Carol Berkin is the author of the book The Bill of Rights: The Fight to Secure America's Liberties, published in 2015. In this book, she exposes her interpretation of the process of creation of the Declaration of Independence and the Declaration of Rights.
Her interpretation of these historical events is framed in a vision of the founding fathers as mere mortals who ignored the possibility that the new government they were building would last for many years.
Based on the above, it can be inferred that Carol Berkin and Charles Beard have different views of the Constitution and the founding fathers such as:
- Charles considers that they wrote the constitution for their convenience.
- Carol describes them as ordinary people who wanted to change their situation and establish a government for all.
Learn more in: brainly.com/question/1992478
Answer:
American Indians before European contact; Part iii: Indian ... native peoples began to concentrate settlements near streams and rivers, ... 700 a.d.), an important American Indian cultural tradition known as the ... example of a mound that was at the heart of a town site built by Mississippian people.
Explanation:
Where are the answers we need to choose from
Answer:
multinational US corporations
Explanation:
Roosevelt declared the United States' intention to make effective use of its newly acquired naval force to preserve peace in America, and to ensure the free exchange and financing on terms of the United States, in the same way as achieved by European powers worldwide. Roosevelt decided to avoid any justification from the European powers to interfere in Latin America as it would endanger interests and security of the U.S. The involvement of the US kept going through loans, the import-export activities, the existence of American businesses in Latin America, extended to protect the self-interest of the U.S.
Spartans had a Diarchy, Monarchy, and a Republic.
