Percent markup based on the selling price: 28.1%
Explanation:
The cost of the TV for the seller was
Of this, the markup of this price was 39%. Therefore, the value of the markup (in dollars) with respect to the cost for the seller was
So, this was the markup relative to the cost for the seller.
The price paid by the purchaser instead is
Therefore, the percent markup based on the selling price (paid by the purchaser) is:
Learn more about percentages:
brainly.com/question/82877
brainly.com/question/1834017
#LearnwithBrainly
Answer:
The correct answer is Limited Liability Partnerships.
Explanation:
A Limited Liability Company is a type of mercantile company, in which the liability is limited to the capital contributed, and therefore, in the event that debts are incurred, it does not respond with the personal assets of the partners, but to the one contributed in said Limited company. It presents as a capitalist-type society in which capital, which will be divided into social interests, will be integrated by the contributions of all partners, who will not respond personally to social debts.
Social ACTIONS are not equivalent to the actions of corporations, as there are legal obstacles to their transmission. In addition, they do not have a "value" character and cannot be represented by means of securities or account entries, and their transmission by means of the public document that will be registered in the partner register book is mandatory. It will be constituted in a public deed and subsequently in the registration of the commercial register, at which time it acquires legal personality.
The reason why the manager wants the person with 6 months of experience is the fact that a person with 30 years of experience is overqualified for an entry level position.
<h3>What is an entry level position?</h3>
An entry level position is a job that is designated for the people that have just left school.
The kind of people that are fitted for such positions are those that have just graduated from the university.
The person with 30 years of experience does not fit into this category.
Read more on entry level here:
brainly.com/question/14689930
According to empirical research, in countries where stockholders' rights are strong, firms issue <u>More </u>stock than in countries where stockholders' rights are weak. Researchers conclude that strong stockholders' rights <u>reduce</u> moral hazard in stock markets.
<u>Explanation</u>
A <u>Moral hazard</u> is said to have occurred when one party (i.e insured Party) increases its exposure to risk ,because some other party bears the cost of those Risk.It reflects the tendency of a person to take more risk as the consequence of the risk taken has to be beard by some other party
<u>The moral hazard problem is </u><u>less </u><u> severe in bond markets than in stock markets. In addition, moral hazard arises in bond markets when firms issue bonds with high default risk.</u>
<u />
So it is appropriate to say that , in countries where stockholders' rights are strong, firms issue <u>More </u>stock than in countries where stockholders' rights are weak. Researchers conclude that strong stockholders' rights <u>reduce</u> moral hazard in stock markets.
Over 300 since a lot of people tend to use more than one
<span />
