The economic principle of substitution says that when there are two houses in the same neighborhood with the same size, appeal, and utility, the lower-priced one will tend to sell first.
<h3>The economic principle of substitution</h3>
- According to the principle of substitution, the cost of purchasing a substitute that is just as desired tends to establish the upper limit of value, assuming no inopportune delays.
- A shrewd investor would not spend more on an asset that generates income than it would cost to construct or buy an asset of a similar nature.
- According to this theory, the cost of acquiring a comparable substitute property with the same use, design, and revenue determine the maximum value of a property in most cases.
- For instance, why would somebody pay $1,000,000 for a home when they could pay $750,000 for a different but as appealing home in the same neighborhood?
To learn more about the economic principle of substitution refer to:
brainly.com/question/9659517
#SPJ4
Answer: 4) No change in the money supply because the $200 in currency has been converted to a $200 increase in checkable deposits
Explanation:
The money supply refers to the total amount of money currently in circulation. In this instance it remains the same because no new money was introduced into the economy.
All that has happened is that Ms. Rogers took her $200 which was already in circulation and part of money supply and deposited it in her checking account. The money is therefore still in circulation, just not in immediate cash.
Money supply therefore remains the same.
Answer:
Market segmentation
Explanation:
Market segmentation is the process of dividing a market into distinct groups of buyers who have different needs, characteristics, or behavior.
The businesses use market segmentation to separate each market from another to study their demand closely. It helps them in catering to them according to their characteristics. They are able to treat every market according to its unique characteristics and generate more profit while doing that.
Answer:
Yield to maturity is 7.93%
Yield to call is 7.83%
Explanation:
I calculated both the yield to maturity and yield to call using the rate formula in excel which is =rate(nper,pmt,pv,-fv)
nper is the year to maturity and year to call of 18 years and 8 years respectively.
pmt is the periodic coupon payment is 9%*1000=$90 in each case.
pv is the present value in each case of $1100.35
The future value which is the redemption value is $1000 for yield to maturity and $1060 for yield to call
Find attached detailed calculation
Answer:
Explanation below
Explanation:
When organizations are looking at hiring interns, they should make sure it does not go against the laws of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) which broadly defines what it means to employ someone and remained silent regarding whether interns should be exempted from minimum wages.
FLSA provides that if your company like that of Wayne in the question, benefits from the use of interns they hired, then they must pay them a sum that is equivalent to the minimum wage.
But if the intern does not do any work that directly benefits the organization, but just there to learn and watch how things are going, then it can be justified in not paying them at all.
so Wayne's rights have been violated since the wage was below the minimum wage.
