1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Troyanec [42]
4 years ago
11

*I need some help please*

History
1 answer:
Alex Ar [27]4 years ago
6 0
Compass, gunpowder, paper making
You might be interested in
Although Brown v. Board of Education established that the segregation of schools was unconstitutional,
Serhud [2]

Answer:

what next?

Explanation:

is there more to this question?

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What was the purpose of the harsh punishments under the Qin dynasty
Alecsey [184]

Answer:

supposed to deter lawbreaking, many people ran afoul of the law. The Qin Law Code covered so many offenses that common people frequently did not realize they had committed a crime until they had been arrested.

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Dr. Zaius believes that no one theory can explain human development and has developed an approach that incorporates elements fro
Rina8888 [55]

Answer:

Eclectic theorist

Explanation:

Eclectic theorist -

It refers to the person , who believes that not a single paradigm is sufficient , but a set of theories are responsible to study a particular topic , is referred to as a Eclectic theorist .

Hence , by using various theories gives a better idea about the topic .

Hence, from the scenario of the question,

Dr, Zaius is an Eclectic theorist .

3 0
4 years ago
The 1954 landmark civil rights Supreme Court decision was called
Leya [2.2K]

Answer:

Brown v. Board of Education.

Explanation:

The 1954 Supreme Court landmark case  Brown v. Board of Education ended segregation in public schools, reverting the 1896 Plessy versus Ferguson decision. It says that separate schools for children of different races are unconstitutional.

7 0
4 years ago
Why have debates become more consistent since 1987 ?
WITCHER [35]

Answer:

In 1987 the debates stopped being partisan and stopped showing bias, which increased its popularity.

Explanation:

In 1987 the debates began to be managed by a non-partisan civic organization, ending sponsorships and preventing candidates from determining how the debate should be conducted. This made the debates less manipulated, reaching subjects that the candidates did not expect, allowing the viewer to, in fact, be able to assess each candidate's resourcefulness, preparation and ability when answering pertinent questions about the government and the country. .

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • When was the Roman Empire into a Western and Eastern Empire?
    12·1 answer
  • People who move from place to place to find food and
    11·2 answers
  • why does King think the tension stirred up by his protest movement promotes social and political reform.
    7·1 answer
  • Which military advantage was not held by the North?
    14·1 answer
  • Describe how kublai khan treated his Chinese subjects
    13·1 answer
  • ME GIV BRAINLY ANSWER PLIZ
    14·1 answer
  • How was the English east India company created ​
    15·1 answer
  • Chapter 25: The US & World War II
    14·1 answer
  • What did labor unions want to help workers get?
    11·1 answer
  • The common characteristics of these countries can be attributed to their —
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!