The word used for such statements as described here is sensationalist.
Explanation:
Sensationalist statements are those that are designed to gauge reactions out of people and not necessarily raise the level of, or contribute onto any meaningful discussion in any way.
The statement has no semblance of facts to back it up and is often very exaggerated form of a truth that has been convoluted beyond its sense so it serves only to rile people up and not to make them discuss things.
It is often used in rhetoric to drive the points away from discussion and make speeches out of debates.
<span>One shade the more, one ray the less, Had half impaired the nameless grace Which waves in every raven tress,
Or softly lightens o’er her face; Where thoughts serenely sweet express, How pure, how dear their dwelling-place.
This is correct, hope this helps!</span>
In looking at the story, “Night,” by Elie Wiesel, we see that it is a story about a male Jewish teenager who experiences the Holocaust. During his experiences, we see that his faith is affected in two different ways. Initially, the events he sees strengthens his faith because religion is comforting during his earlier experiences. Later on, his experiences because of all the atrocities he has seen, he begins to lose his faith. When writing an essay on how Eliezer’s experiences have affected his faith, you could talk about, both, how his experiences were positively and negatively affected. This would give you an essay of four paragraphs. Paragraph 1 would be your introduction where you set up your paper and include a thesis statement and mention something similar to “Eliezer was certainly a Jewish man of faith; however, his experiences within the Holocaust caused his faith to be both positively and negatively affected.” What this tells readers is that Paragraph 2 will be about the positive effects on his faith (where you’ll provide examples from the story). Then, Paragraph 3 will be about the negative effects (where you’ll, too, provide examples from the text. Lastly, you’ll provide your conclusion in Paragraph 4 where you’ll provide some final insights and reiterate your thesis statement (restating it but using different words).
Answer:
"An Ordinary Man" is an autobiography of Paul Rusesabagina. Paul was a hotel manager. On 7th April 1994, Rwanda Genocide broke down in Rwanda. Mass slaughter of Tutsi took place in the city during Rwanda Civil War.
Explanation:
Paul Rusesabagina was able to save 1,268 people in his hotel during this mass murder. The text evidence of Rusesabagina's actions are:
<em>"When the militia and the Army came with orders to kill my guests, </em><u><em>I took them into my office, treated them like friends, offered them beer and cognac, and then persuaded them to neglect their task that day.</em></u><em> And when they came back, </em><u><em>I poured more drinks and kept telling them they should leave in peace once again</em></u><em>. It went on like this for seventy-six days."</em>
<em>"I would have used in saner times to </em><u><em>order a shipment of pillowcases</em></u><em>, for example, or </em><u><em>tell the shuttle van driver to pick up a guest at the airport.</em></u><em>"</em>
<em>"</em><u><em>I stayed at my post and continued to do my job as manager..."</em></u>
