Hello. You did not provide the article to which this question is related. However, when researching your question on the internet, I was able to find a question exactly the same as yours that shows that the question refers to the article "Proposed Treatment to Fix Genetic Diseases Raises Ethical Issues" that shows the attempt of scientists to legally approve the practices to manipulate the DNA present in the maternal egg, to remove possible DNA errors that can cause genetic diseases in babies.
If I were one of the scientists on the team who wants to legalize this practice, I would try to argue against society's concerns about the problems that could arise from this manipulation.
A major concern that people have is that this practice generates "manufactured" babies. I would fight this fear, showing that we would only deal with DNAs that have flaws that can trigger diseases, that is, the modified DNA, would maintain all the characteristics that the baby would normally have, but would only rid him of genetic diseases, which would be very advantageous for the child and the family. This would not create a "manufactured" baby, nor would it cause any adverse reaction to the child or the mother.
In addition, this practice would be performed on very few women, as 1 in 200 women have DNA defects. This shows that this practice would only be used in cases of need and these cases would be very few.
Answer:
Philip Duck's story of Gun, is a science fiction story. Here the gun is protecting a treasure trove of artifacts.
Explanation:
The Poet composed a story based on Science fiction, where the M-65 gun is protecting a basket of artifacts hidden beneath a tomb. It contains, films, photographs and some historical documents of a long lost civilization. The gun is programmed to shoot down any flying object entering the city. Then gun is protecting the city from trespassing aliens.
The events in the story support the idea that first impressions are unreliable the moment a character has had of something or someone, it's completely different about what something or someone really is.
We can arrive at this answer because:
- The first impression is the impression, the idea, and the judgment you made of something or someone the first time you see them.
- This impression is carried out in generalized, superficial, and biased concepts, taking into account the appearance and behavior of the person or object.
However, a person's personality and actual behavior can only be known through coexistence, in which case, a person may think that their classmate is kind, the day he meets him, but he doesn't know that this classmate is an arrogant and petty person in their daily lives.
In that case, you must identify this type of event under "All Lovely Stars" to answer this question.
Unfortunately, you didn't show the passage the question refers to, which prevents me from answering the question accurately, but I hope the information above will help you.
More info on "All Lovely Stars":
brainly.com/question/25821071
1. An interview — P because Sotomayor is directly commenting on her own works
2. An analysis — S because someone else is writing about/speaking on Sotomayor’s works from their own perspective
3. An email — P because Sotomayor herself is writing to someone else
4. An essay — S because someone else is writing about Sotomayor’s ruling from their perspective
