All categories

3 years ago

One of the fastest way to acquire knowledge is to hire individuals or purchase entire companies that have valued knowledge.

Business

1 answer:

lutik1710 [3]3 years ago

3 0

Answer:

True

Explanation:

Knowledge is something that cannot just be acquired within a day. It requires lots of reading, studying different books, rigorous amount of trainings and carrying out various research to learn something new. All this takes some period of time, maybe months or years because there is a need to perfectly master the field of study.

Therefore one of the fastest ways to acquire knowledge at a fast rate is to hire an individual who is an expert in that field or purchase an entire company that has already gained the knowledge because trying to achieve that on your own is time consuming.

This is an added advantage to the organisation as it helps to increase its growth rate and face any form of competition in the market.

Hence the statement above is true.

You might be interested in

A strong culture should reduce employee turnover because it results in ________.

Advocard [28]

<span>A strong culture should reduce employee turnover because it results in </span>cohesiveness and organizational commitment.

3 0

4 years ago

On January 1, 2017, Marin Company purchased 12% bonds, having a maturity value of $320,000, for $344,260.74. The bonds provide t

kap26 [50]

Answer and Explanation:

The Journal entry is shown below:-

1. Debt Investment Dr, $344,260.74

To Cash $344,260.74

(Being cash paid is recorded)

2. Interest Receivable Dr, $38,400

To Debt Investment $3,973.93

To Interest Revenue $34,426.07

(Being interest received is recorded)

Fair Value Adjustment Dr, $1,713.19 ($342,000 -$340,286.81)

To Unrealized Holding Gain or Loss - Equity $1,713.19

(Being fair value adjustment is recorded)

3. Unrealized Holding Gain or Loss - Equity $7928.68

($335,915.49 - $329,700 + $1,713.19)

To Fair Value Adjustment 7,928.68

(Being unrealized loss or gain is recorded)

Working note

Book value of Interest Interest Amortization Book value

debt beginning Revenue Receivable (d = c - d) of debt

(a) b=(a × 10%) c at the end

($320,000 × 12%) (e - d)

$344,260.74 $34,426.07 $38,400 $3,973.93 $340,286.81

$340,286.81 $34,028.68 $38,400 $4,371.32 $335,915.49

8 0

3 years ago

The jackson family is undecided about whether or nara buy a new car of the

ICE Princess25 [194]

The question is incomplete. The complete question is :

The Jackson family is undecided about whether or not to buy a new car. If the probability is .9 that they will buy one, and if the probability is .3 that they will buy a Ford, and if the probability is .4 that they will purchase a car getting more than 20 miles per gallon, what is the probability that they will buy either a car getting more than 20 miles per gallon or a Ford, if all Fords get more than 20 miles per gallon?

Solution :

Given that :

The probability of buying a new car, $P(NC) = 0.9$

Probability of buying Ford = 0.3

That is, if Jackson family buy a car that is a ford car, $P(F) = 0.9 \times 0.3$

= 0.27

The probability for getting more than 20 miles per gallon = 0.4

That is if Jackson family buy a car that have more than 20 miles per gallon mileage, $P(20) = 0. 9 \times0.4=0.36$

The conditions

All of the car have more than 20 miles per gallon mileage.

It means that buying a ford car is subset of getting more than 20 miles per gallon.

$P(20 \text{ miles per gallon}\ \cap \ \text{Ford})=P(F)$

Therefore, the probability of buying a car either getting more than 20 miles per gallon or ford = $P(20 \text{ miles per gallon}\ \cup \ \text{Ford})$

Therefore,

$P(20 \text{ miles per gallon}\ \cup \ \text{Ford})=P(20) + P(F) - P(20 \text{ miles per gallon }\cap \ \text{Ford})$

$P(20 \text{ miles per gallon}\ \cup \ \text{Ford})=P(20) + P(F) - P(F)$

$P(20 \text{ miles per gallon}\ \cup \ \text{Ford})=P(20)$

= 0.36

Thus the probability that Jackson family is buying a car either getting more than 20 miles per gallon or ford is 0.36

3 0

3 years ago

A high-end clothing manufacturer has a policy to inspect each article of clothing before it is shipped to customers. Recently, t

Dima020 [189]

Answer:

Examine the reliability of the process.

Explanation:

As a high end clothing company, it is a very good initiative and welcoming to have clothes that possibly posses global version and global value so it is good for such routine checks to be done. This could be tedious and cost the company more than usual.

In this case where there are a reasonable amount of such clothes failing these routine checks, it is not too good for the company as more re-evaluations are to be done in order to cub the rate at which this is in the last six months. This process of examining the reliability process is the company's best bet to tackle the issue they have at hand.

8 0

3 years ago

The following information is from the 2017 records of Armand Music Shop: Accounts receivable, December 31, 2017 $43,000 (deb

Llana [10]

Answer:

The bad debt expense amounts to $ 10,680

Explanation:

The bad debt expenses for the year 2017 is computed as:

As the percent of sakes method is used for estimating the bad debt expense. Therefore, it is computed as:

Bad debt expense = Net Credit Sales × Estimate Percent

where

Net credit sales amounts to $178,000

Estimate percent is 6%

So, putting the values above:

Bad debt expense = $178,000 × 6%

Bad debt expense = $10,680

Therefore, the bad debt expense amounts to $10,680

7 0

3 years ago