Answer and Explanation:
The computation of the service level and the corresponding optimal stocking level is shown below:
Given that
Selling price = SP = $4.50
Cost price = CP = $3.00
So,
Salvage value = V = $1.50
Average daily demand (d) = 35 quarts
The standard deviation of daily demand = 4 quarts
based on the above information
Overage cost = (Co) is
= CP - V
= $3.00 - $1.50
= $1.50
Now
Underage cost= (Cu)
= SP - CP
= $4.50 - $3.00
= $1.50
So,
Service level is
= Cu ÷ (Co + Cu)
= 1.50 ÷ (1.50 + 1.50)
= 1.50 ÷ 3.00
= 0.50
= 50%
Now
At 50 % service level, the value of Z is 0
So,
Optimal stocking level is
= d + Z × standard deviation
= 35 + (0 × 4)
= 35 + 0
= 35 quarts
Answer: The invisible hand
Explanation: Invisible hand can be defined as those unobservable market forces which helps the forces of demand and supply to reach to an equilibrium level.
In the given case, Daniel is giving work to local suppliers and jobs to residents as well as producing demand in the market by its products, thus, we can conclude that the given case is an example of invisible hand.
Answer:
The answer is: Delegated powers are those that are exclusive to national government, like printing money.
Explanation:
Delegated powers are powers given to the federal (national) government and specifically outlined by the US Constitution (Article 1, Section 8). They outline the authority and limits of the three branches of the federal government (legislative, executive and judiciary). Some examples of delegated powers are power to declare war, lay and collect taxes, print and coin money, etc.
<u>Solution and Explanation:</u>
As the utility function is concave in shape, so person is risk averse. Thus, he will not accept the gamvle.
The difference between utility at point A&C = 70 minus 65 = $5, is less than a the difference between A&B = 65 minus 55 = $10
<u>MCQ:
</u>
Answer is option a&d - risk averse people fear a lot for losing money, thus they overestimate the probability of loss
Since, shape of utility function is concave, hence the double derivative of utility with respect to wealth is negative, so utility falls at an decreasing rate , as wealth increases
