Answer:
a) although both methods result in the same net increase or decrease in cash for the year, net cash flow from operating activities will be different under the two methods
Explanation:
Using the indirect method, computation of cash flow from operating activities begins with net income as shown in the income statement. The FASB also permits both methods but has expressed a preference for the direct method and the direct method shows the specific cash inflow and outflows for each operating activities of the business.
This option that does not align with the differences between the 2 methods is that the cash flow reported under direct and indirect method for operating activities would always remain the same notwithstanding the method used.
Answer:
Option A is the more convinient.
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
She wants you to choose which one of the following sets of cash flows you would like to receive:Option A: Receive a one-time gift of $ 10,000 today. Option B: Receive a $1500 gift each year for the next 10 years. The first $1500 would be received 1 year from today. Option C: Receive a one-time gift of $18,000 10 years from today.
We will assume a discount rate of 10%.
Option A:
Present value= $10,000
Option B:
Final value= {A*[(1+i)^n-1]}/i
A= annual deposit
FV= {1500*[(1.10^10)-1]/0.10= 23,906.14
PV= FV/(1+i)^n
PV= 23,906.14/1.10^10= $9,216.85
Option C:
PV= 18,000/1.10^10= $6,939.80
Answer and Explanation:
The computation of the earning per share is shown below:
As we know that
Earning per share = Net income ÷ Average number of common shares outstanding
For year 1
Dakota
= $3,715 ÷ 599 shares
= $5.30 per share
Jersey
= $3,187 ÷ 363 shares
= $8.78 per share
For year 2
Dakota
= $2,182 ÷ 594 shares
= $3.67 per share
Jersey
= $1,925 ÷ 334 shares
= $5.76 per share
Answer: B. Foreign cars become more expensive.
Explanation: The tariff slapped on imported goods such as cars and other foreign commodities will raise the overall cost of the product on the side of the seller and definitely the final selling price of such product to the consumers. This is used to raise revenue for the government and also to encourage the manufacture, adoption and support for locally manufactured products. Locally manufactured substitute will tend to be cheaper and the additional tariff may put importers and consumers off, and hence settle for cheaper locally made alternative.